Thatās my point, 12 qtrs as a forward he has looked good in 1qtr at AFL level, his 1st game has been his best and it was as a defender.
same at SANFL level for West Adelaide.
His main weapon was his intercept marking and 60m kicks, he can do these 2 things more often as a defender, as that is where he reads the play the best.
Thatās just my opinion though, he really gets lost playing forward.
Nah, thereās many that have gone before him of his shape and size (I think the technical term is āA Lump of a Ladā ) that took as long to reach full fitness. The most prime & easily identifiable example being our own Jobe Brownlow.
You do know they changed the academy rules, right? And even then they werenāt taking older players unless they really needed them. They got rid of them (e.g. Bird). Also, if theyāre senior players theyāre likely free agents. E.g. Zaharakis.
Itās not ridiculous. For example: we finish 11th & get pick 26, Zaharakis leaves as a FA, we get an end of 2nd round compensation pick (a conservative estimate). Thatās enough (26 & 37) to make a points win trade with an academy club who has a pick around 13-15 (say GC with Portās 1st rounder).
We have someone in the VFL that could play that role, someone who has been likened to another Ballarat boy in Isaac Smith.
Just hope we can keep him under the radar.
You mean apart from the fact that the AFL changed the rules to make those trades less likely? Or how they changed the rules with future trading, so first round picks are more valuable?
Or how about the issue I donāt think there are many academy players being spruiked this year?
What rules did the AFL change for trades since last year? And how did they change the rules for future trading since last year? There are a few academy player names being mentioned, but certainly not as many as last year.
Iām not saying itās likely, but itās hardly ridiculous.
They changed the academy rules last year. Which is part of the reason you didnāt see any of those types of trades, whereas in 2015 there were a raft of them.