#10 St Francis de Agressi - up to 2021 round 2

[Klawdy]

You don’t seem to be a fan of Blitz posters judging by your posting history.

[Deckham]

Not me. I think he looked horrible early but had a good 2017.
However I don’t think he’s either quick or agile. Either way though, is he better than Francis in those factors? Maybe but Baguley is very much on the downslope and Francis the up.

I rate Francis more than most.
He has nothing to do with Baguley and his position though.
Obviously - Bags is getting older and isn’t going to improve.
He is a good mark, has a good leap, is above average in speed, has a decent tank and reads the ball and player well. Exactly what you’d like in his position.

[Killer_Mike]

Who do you think he was playing on all year?

[werewolf]

I agree with everything you have said. However what I said was that if and to again highlight it’s a big if, Baguley is one player that Francis could replace. Francis needs to make it a discussion point!

[Windy_Dill]

So what’s special about Baguley’s role that physically Francis can’t do? To highlight again, I’m not suggesting Francis comes in for Baguley. Francis has a long way to go. What I said was that Francis could take Baguley spot if Francis improves and given Baguley doesn’t add much aerobically.

Baguley doesn’t offer much aerobically? And Francis is his replacement for this reason? Do go on.

I wouldn’t want to see Francis line up on Eddie Betts next year. Eddie Betts however would love the opportunity.

[werewolf]

I’m not sure how many different ways I can clarify the very same position I posted initially? I NEVER SAID FRANCIS SHOULD REPLACE BAGULEY!!! I said he could IF he improves given Baguley doesn’t offer much aerobically. Not rocket science.

[cul_de_sac]

So in the space of one off-season Baguley has become slow and incapable of turning with no tank?

This does not sound like the guy who I’ve been watching for the last 6 years.

[Deckham]

I’m not sure how many different ways I can clarify the very same position I posted initially? I NEVER SAID FRANCIS SHOULD REPLACE BAGULEY!!! I said he could IF he improves given Baguley doesn’t offer much aerobically. Not rocket science.

I don’t think, even with Francis’s inevitable improvement - and he will be a star - he will ever be the kind of player to replace Bags.
If we’re talking about a spot in the 22, and not Bag’s actual position - then you may as well just say best 22.

[Killer_Mike]

Why do you hate Baguley?

[werewolf]

Serious? Please show me where I obviously inadvertently indicated that?

[Killer_Mike]

I’m joking mate

[werewolf]

Is that in response to one of my posts? If so, please confirm where I said that.

[cul_de_sac]

Is that in response to one of my posts? If so, please confirm where I said that.

Sure thing…

Baguley is not quick or agile.

Baguley is not aerobically gifted

I don’t think he’s either quick or agile.

Baguley is limited aerobically

Baguley doesn’t add much aerobically

would you put Baguley on a small nippy player? I would not unless I had nobody better.

Baguley doesn’t offer much aerobically.

[BLOODSTAINED_DEVILS]

Sherman is right…

[werewolf]

Yep so you said “incapable of turning with no tank”. Your own quotes confirmed this statement is a nonsense. The question provided to me was how could Francis possibly replace Baguley. Hence my comments. It’s not a criticism of Baguley who has been a good player.

[HowManyGoal]

Bobshearman does not rate this post.

[cul_de_sac]

I think maybe you’re taking this all a bit too seriously

[Bomber_Billy]

Werewolf. Baguley and Francis are completely different types of players. Can’t believe we’re even having this convo.

[Vince_Black]

Werewolf. Baguley and Francis are completely different types of players. Can’t believe we’re even having this convo.

Yeah but if Frances dyed his hair, shrunk a bit and started running slower then he might be able to take Bags’ spot.

[Albert_Thurgood]

Rubbish!

He would also have had to come from Frankston as a HBF.