I’m not saying the players have the right to control the board and thus have power over all decisions.
Rather they as a key stakeholder they have the right to be represented on the board.
I think there was a conversation with Darli and another person on the ideal composition of the board. During that it was floated that two board members should be past players. The point I’d make is that those two past players don’t need to be random selections, shouldn’t the players get some input into who they feel would best represent them.
I’d never want the players to approve/disapprove of all posts, but have no problem if they advocate for an individual from time to time.