#22 - Sam Durham - thru to 2032!

Why? Frankly, the statement is a bit ridiculous if arguing for no penalty (and Hird didn’t do that). The law is almost entirely the reverse. Look at motor vehicle law. The car following that ploughs into the back of the car in front is pretty much always at-fault. Because no matter how ridiculous the front car’s breaking, or swerving, or whatever was, the onus is on the car following to leave enough space to break in time.

Durham can expect that all he wants. But when Cerra clearly hasn’t braced himself, it is Durham’s responsibility to pull out or otherwise stop himself from making a connection to Cerra’s head.

He almost achieves that, but probably failed. Which is why he’ll get some weeks. We just need to argue Durham almost succeeded, made minimal contact, and therefore should have a minimal penalty.

And to be clear if it is from the footage I saw of Hird speaking on this, in that footage Hird did say Durham was at fault. Just that Cerra used bad technique and contributed.

2 Likes

Just to be clear, Hird says Durham made a mistake, that its weeks, and Durham shouldn’t have gone in like that.

2 Likes

Yeah - but his main point is that Cerra attacked the ball with poor technique still stands and if he entered the contest with his body turned he’d be less likely to get hurt.

Durham can change his ways, but if Cerra doesn’t he may end up concussed again from another hit.

7 Likes

And that there is the problem. people are going to get hurt all the time if they think the duty of care is with the other bloke. Back to the car analogy - you can slow the traffic down all you want, then pedestrians will show less respect for the oncoming car believing it will stop - but sometimes they don’t

Get ■■■■■■

https://x.com/1116sen/status/1932354551182660079?s=46&t=YGdPXSqojqeDwdjPFXFTRQ

8 Likes

Haha what a d-ckhead

18 Likes

This is the same moron who thought Rampe didnt shake the goal post and that the umpire had made the correct decision to not award a 50m penalty.

20 Likes

The AFL only cares about the optics

Why does Healy have such hatred for Essendon, serious question, did something happen?

Durham attacks the footy exactly the same was as Zac Butters and as Hirdy says how you want your footballers to attack the ball.

The thing is there will be incidents in full contact sport. It’s gonna happen again and again.

Sam won’t change how he plays and nor should he.

If he was in line for the Brownlow I reckon he appeals and or the afl find a way to get him off.

I’m not fussed. Durham or not we are getting absolutely schooled by Geelong and Freo over the next two weeks.

Rest up Sammy. Looking forward to having you back

just a quick look at some of season 22


Screenshot_7
Screenshot_5

3 Likes

He wrote years ago that when he was being courted by Edelsten to go and play for Sydney, he was told by Edelsten that Sheeds was on board as coach. For some reason he then had the ■■■■■ with Sheedy and Essendon, rather than Dr Geoff.

1 Like

Exactly. Surely Cerra has been coached on the correct way to approach the ball… bomber thompson’s priority with the young players was always to teach them how to be “safe on the field and when going for the ball”

Mostly always comes back to sheedy treating them like the peasants they were and also the fact that Essendon were a serious threat on field (hard as that is to believe these days).

2 Likes

When is Sammy scheduled for the lethal injection?

3 Likes

He is eh? Just a total spanner.

How he keeps a job.

I only like the footy shows where it’s all ex footballers now(like on the couch - even if it’s a bit hawthorn/collingwood/Brisbane centric ). The ones where they have a muppet from a newspaper it’s just painful.

1 Like

Right after he’s shackled and dragged along Bourke Street while the townsfolk throw poo at him, if Michael Gleeson from the Age gets his way.

They should of got ahead of it and said the ankle he got is going to keep him out for a couple anyway.

He’s absolutely correct tho - two weeks is a farce

One week would’ve been appropriate

4 Likes

how much of a rat colleague at afl house was brad? to have the media briefed to this level against one of his players for the 2nd time