Point 1) Myers was injured and listed on the LTI list in late Feb
Point 2) Leuey wasnt injured until March. He was still playing well after Myers ruptured the tendon.
Point 3) Given points 1 and 2, the insinuation that we only listed him because we needed SMck in the ruck is total and utter bullshit. In fact, Laverde got injured the same day Leuey did and could have allowed Smck to be promoted. I dunno, Maybe, just maybe, Reidy thought Myers actually would need 8 weeks?
Point 4) that entire article is a bizarrely written, steaming pile of horse manure. It doesnt even justify or even explain the claim that we made a paperwork error. The idiot who asked Beveridge about Minson is clearer thinking than whoever wrote this crap. And anyone on here that assumes that we somehow made an error based on this article is being stupid.