Get your point but a lot of those players you have mentioned didn’t play midfield from the start and are higher picks than Langford or Laverde.
Langford had actually played considerable football in his first two seasons but was held back this year to work on his midfield craft.
Lav has obviously has had his injury concerns.
I don’t think any of the players you named were elite at 20. You could argue that none have ever been elite.
We put very high expectations on our players but some require more time than others. Langford in particular I believe will make a very good footballer.
Of course not. However it would be nice if by now at least one of them was a regular in our best 22. Yes I know Laverde has been hindered by injury
Having said that I have always rated Langford as a forward. I reckon the attempts to make him a mid will hinder his progress as a forward and he will be in and out of the side forever as a result. I could be wrong. Anyway our loss if it doesn’t work out
Heppell is a serviceable B grader who took a few years to establish himself? You know he was the rising star winner in his first year and an All-Australian and best and fairest a couple of years later right?
I would have gone as fare to say that in the early days Ricky was ahead of Stants. Unfortunately there was that incident where he was beaten up and he didn’t seem to be the same player after that. I dont know if that was the cause or it was just the way the players developed but that is my recollection.