LOL.
Just mentioned on SEN. Havenāt seen it but apparently it was flush on the jaw.
Donāt you have to knock them to the ground to get suspended
I think any jumper punch that makes contact to the head automatically gets a week I think.
Martin got away with one last week. There have been a few let through after they made an example of Hawkins when it was flavour of the month
Watch Hooker get done but Redpath getting off
1 Like
with the way itās interpreted now any jumper punch of sufficient force to warrant a report gets a week automatically. So itās either a week or he gets off due to insufficient force. And itās sounds like the week is more likely.
The Hawkins jumper punch was a full on punch and he deserved to be suspended.
He was lucky he only got one. Getting away with jumper punches has always been BS imo.
1 Like
No chance. Heās gone.
Very disappointing if that happens, especially when our season is on the line and a big game coming up. I donāt recall seeing anything untoward, just Hooksey giving it to his opponent in the last every time he kicked a goal. FWIW it didnāt even make it on the Herald Sunās MRP watch listā¦
I would like to see that footage to see what he is up against
Hooker out
Ambrose in
Hartley 6 goals against the Dogs.
1 Like
Who in particular mentioned it on SENā¦someone who doesnāt like us?
He doesnāt follow the bulldogs by any chance? editā¦i just found on twitter he is a north supporterā¦sour grapes i bet
The irony of this post is not lost on me.
Someone was always going to be the unlucky one to cop an inconsistently applied jumper punch penalty.
1 Like
That said ā¦ Stewart plays the Hooker role, LAV plays the Stewart role and BBB plays the LAV role.
Lets be honest he shouldnt of ruffled his hair after he kicked the goalā¦
He should of smashed him in the side of the head with a tin that had a few coins on it.
Poor form cale, poor form
3 Likes
Or Langford in? Dogs have a heap of mid-sized types so going slightly shorter against them wouldnāt be a terrible option anyway.
1 Like