I think as far as intercept marking defender, you are missing Gleeson. He was very good at that last year and we are missing him this year due to injury. Our backline looks much better balanced with him there.
You have Gleeson there I reckon you find Saad is more free to create run off the backline as well as also intercepting more which he does quite well.
That’s a decent point, that we need to “break” the working system to fit Stringer in, so that we may as well send Hooker back as part of that breaking. It is certainly true that Stringer doesn’t work at all well on his defensive side, so we’ve added a small who (to date) is adding limited damage and is weakening the defensive pressure. We’ve also not had Colyer, who for all his faults had speed and does work very hard.
I’m not sure if moving Hooker back is the best response to bringing Stringer in, but I can see the argument
Forgive me I haven’t read through this thread but pretty sure the discussion is Hooker to play back??
So if I have this correct, most clubs are opting to play small/defensive forward line, however we are want a backline of Hooker, Hurley, Brown, Hartley, Baguley or Ambrose on any given game?
Gee wiz opposition forwards must be trembling with fear of our pacey backline.
I felt like the only reason Watts kicked 3 was because we turned the ball over in a poor position and our defence was caught out.
It’s not like he was beaten one on one.