#28 Mitch "Swingman" Brown - extended to 2019


#1162

The tense use in that language hurts my brain.


#1163

As much as it was a horror year onfield, Brown played all but 1 game in 2016, finished 6th in the Crichton and played more football than any other year of his career.

Barrett’s a clueless idiot, who takes cheap potshots from the rafters


#1164

Its actually been edited. When l read it this morning it was originally about Brown as a 2016 top up player still being on the list. So someone’s corrected the error and he’s tried to cover it up. Because someone drafted in 2015 still being on a list is unbelievable.


#1165

FXD


#1166

Albeit not very well.


#1167

I would love to slide a door right on to Barrett’s neck


#1168

I’d like to slide open the door, put that bloke outside, and slide it shut.

And close the blinds.


#1169

And release the hounds.


#1170

I’d like to hire Purple on an exclusive mega deal.

When he has quit all his other gigs and rocks up day 1. I’d explain this is a “sliding doors moment”, your fired.


#1171

If it’s his sliding doors why does he always say “we”? Unless he’s talking in third person and referring to himself of course given he has such a big ego.


#1172

Mitch wasn’t too happy about this proposal.


#1173

Clearly he has never seen Brown play.

It’s never been about whether brown can play, always his body letting him down.


#1174

Mitch Brown is our swingman. He can play forward, back and wing. A great mark and accurate in front of goal. Very under rated and deserve to be a serious contender in our best 22. Too many supporters write Mitch off. He has time and time again proved these supporters of little faith just how useful a player he is. Get off his back and give credit an a go for what he did in 2018.


#1175

The KPFs picked for round 1 will be fascinating. Biggest uncertainty at the moment.


#1176

on ya, mitch.


#1177

Brown is very very mobile. I just wonder whether he would be a better option for the mobile ( CHF) role while Joe could hang around near goals in the first instance, so we minimise chances of a flare up of the early onset OP.
That leaves Smack as the second tall and ruck chop out. Would that be too many talls in our forward line? Maybe not, since Mitch can cover a massive amount of ground, right up to the wing/ HBF.


#1178

Rnd 1 injury list…

Out:
Daniher (groin) - indefinite


#1179

Do we go 2 or 3 talls?

Smack
Brown
Stewart
Stringer

Or do we rotate a tall mid like Langford or Laverde?


#1180

You do realise Stringer, Langford an Laverde are all the same height yes?


#1181

Yeah. I’m standing in a 1hr queue waiting for customs. Slowly moving like cattle to slaughter. Not in perfect argument crafting environment!