Disciplined for lieing.
1 Like
for what?
I agreed, but I went the path that it was simply a fitness issue. The same for Langford, lacked the necessary fitness plus he needed to study up on a new role and get some practice at it where the result has less significance. Both have a few years before they peak and what a sight it will be.
1 Like
In a lot of ways the two players are polar opposites.
Parish is more inside when everything says he shouldnāt be and Langford is the opposite.
I value players that can cut sides apart rather than grind them away.
Itās why you will never hear me asking for Wallis on here.
I think Parish can be a good player and Iām pretty confident he will. I just think that Langford will be a star.
The annoying thing is that Langford is playing mostly that forward/midfield utility role when he should be on ball all the time.
I can see why they are doing it though as we are still a slim chance of finals.
Do you think itās a combination of his height and strength up fwd, maturity/experience and coaches lack of confidence in defensive pressure for the time being thatās holding Langford back from the role you want him to play?
When everyone convertsā¦ Please.
Only Muppets thought Parish wasnāt any good. 90+% of blitz have been big fans of Darcy from the get go.
But please carry on being smug.
2 Likes
The only person not on board is the one posting after you
1 Like
and all the nuts going on about clayton oliver, but please keep trying.
Best to ignore them. You may as well get upset about not drafting Chris Judd if youāre going to worry about players we never had access to
1 Like
parish looks to have soaked up Langfordās midfield minutes.
Itās part of the reason I was so hard on Parish earlier. Langford cane in and really started to show his worth.
Langford is very good at the defensive stuff so I canāt see that being the issue. He chases and does all the 1%ās.
The only thing holding Langford back in my opinion is belief from the coaches. Heās clearly not going to have the impact straight away but he needs more exposure.
I have watched him a lot in the VFL and his tool kit is big and when it all clicks he will be a player.
1 Like
the only one soaking up langfords minutes is myers.
youāre deranged on this.
1 Like
No one is soaking up Langfordās midfield minutes. He is playing as a mid, and as a forward. Just like Stringer is.
6 Likes
All the injuries to our forwards are soaking up Langfordās midfield minutes
3 Likes
I love Langford.
But RIGHT NOW if Langford was a better on-baller than Parish heād be playing more on the ball.
But heās not RIGHT NOW.
Parish hunts the footy. Langford is still learning this.
2 Likes
Parish brings an urgency to our ball movement in the contest that basically only zach brings.
2 Likes
I think itās more of a case of Langford being better forward.
1 Like
Correct. He actually has the ability to take the ball away from the contested situation. I would also include Stringer in that group.
Parishās movement in stoppages reminds me a lot of Ben Cousins.
1 Like
Just to qualify my statement THE Langford and Raz are my 2 favourite players.
But Parish has come in and played better football than Kyle in the last few weeks, simple. Has nothing to do with positions but I also couldnāt be happier with the way they have both developed in 2018.
Just let it go man.
1 Like
Stop asking me about it and I will let it go.
2 Likes
Urgency is a very good description.
Seriously though, how good is it to be arguing the toss over who is developing as a better midfielder out of two young guns who are 20 odd years of age. Itās exciting.
3 Likes