Prefer him over Langford and hope he gets his body right.
2 Likes
plz
But yes Laverde is Best 22 when fit and available for mine. Screw form. He doesnβt belong in the VFL.
Really? I think heβs a good player, but Langford has him covered in just about every area apart from short distance speed.
The biggest issue with Laverde (injures aside), is that he is not clean below his knees. For that reason, I donβt see a future for him in the midfield.
I reckon his skill set is best suited to a lead-up forward role. Heβs got safe hands overhead, good pace off the mark and is a good kick for goal.
1 Like
reckon youβre splitting hairs comparing the two. For mine the only significant advantage Langford has over Laverde is one of continuity of football. Laverde, through no fault of his own, has struggled to link more than ~10 senior games together in a row. Where as Langford through the benefit of playing all last year has probably just gone ahead of him on development.
2 Likes
Haircut.
4 Likes
Havenβt seen this just yet personally. Not sure heβs had much of a crack at it yet. I like his strength and ability to get the hands free and dish off a la Hooker.
2 Likes
Pls oh no
Lav VS Lang
Can confirm LAV is A grade garbage below his knees. He doesnβt bend over and if he wants to be a mid he needs to fix this. Also he doesnβt have a midfield tank and doubt with all his injuries he has been able to improve this much.
I also see him as a half forward.
I still love him though.
Excited face?
wtf?
hes not garbage, nowhere near elite. but not garbage.
5 Likes
Iβve hardly seen him collect the ball cleanly below his knees. Ever,
Iβd suggest youβre not watching then.
1 Like
Watching what he barely played last year
Need this bloke back, stat.
Reckon he provides a decent option up forward, and lovely kick for goal.
3 Likes
But have you ever seen him drink while Iβm talking?
Actually, also yes.
Is Jayden laverde! is he in the same mold as Jason Winderlich, who played 110 games over 10 years
Habib pls
6 Likes
DELIST
Lav > Langford
3 Likes