About the selectivity you mean?
Fairly obvious, no? Or maybe not - sometimes it’s hard to see yourself in that way.
Anyway - not my business, nor the topic, never mind me.
Ah, ok then.
Well - anything to do with a player you particularly like, and you’re all gung ho. Almsot anything to do with club admin or coaching, and you hang ■■■■ on it. You can’t take criticism, because you’ll squeal like a little baby girl. And you’re farkin ugly as fark, also. Stick that up your ■■■■, you wanker.
Really? I’d definitely say KM is one of the more positive posters on here. Has some favourites that he pumps up more than others, but is also generally positive about all players.
Just because he sees some (like Guelfi and Parish) in a lesser light than other posters do, doesn’t mean he’s negative about it. Generally he’s talking about wanting them to improve or prove him wrong rather than wanting to dump them.
KM’s only real negativity that i’ve noticed has been towards the coaching panel. But he’s not Robinson Crusoe there
sigh
this is like that Monty Python sketch about arguing.
I only wrote that because you wanted an argument, man. I don’t really know or care about how positive/negative you are. You seem ok. Whatever.
I’m not sure I want him to unseat Myers in the midfield. I want him to be our new Mark Johnson or Solly in the backline. IceMan has that air about him.