#4 Just a Kyle kind of Langford


#5521

Playing young guys also increases the pool of players you can rotate through the firsts - pretty important the way footy is now, where players have to play at such a high tempo, you need to get some fresh legs rotating through the firsts more often than you did in the past.

It’s another area we fall down in - reckon the Dons have the least number of debutantes in 2018 than any other club… inexcusable when this year now is (and probably should have always been) a rebuilding year.


#5522

This year wasn’t and shouldn’t have been a rebuilding year. Our list demographic and the fact we would have expected improvement from finishing 7th said as much

It’s becoming one quickly though based on Neeld’s new midfield strategy & game plan change plus the inability of the coaches to get players to understand it or do it.

Aiming for top 4 ending up bottom 4

So frustrating


#5523

Has to get a go this weekend. Just has to.


#5524

Based on the way it seems like things work these days, if Langford feels like he being jerked around and another club is interested (especially a Victorian club), I’d assume it’d be more or less a done deal by the bye round.


#5525

Yeah.
I can’t even think of an example where a player moving to another club for more opportunity ended in a coach getting the sack.


#5526

I was more referring to their ability to get a senior gig. But agree it’s not a guarantee, but certainly can put a big black mark next to it.


#5527

Should be played for the remainder of the season, simple as that. There can be no argument if he’s given a clear run at it week after week and given the chance to show what he’s got. My view is that he would repay that faith and entrench himself in the team by seasons end - but he has to be given that opportunity. If not, he’s gone, and who can blame him?

I think there’s a fair argument to give Clarke an extended run too, and to see others such as Redman and Long given some game time. Let’s see what they have to offer. Reckon they’d give the team spirit a bit of a bump too.


#5528

Voss/Fevola? For entirely different reasons though


#5529

Ted Richards ended sheeds career.

Had nothing to do with how bad we played…


#5530

I have no info on this and am as confused as most. But… what if, as a crazy scenario, we found out that Langford had already decided to leave after his contract ended, and therefore it’s pointless to play him?

Only thing I can come up with.


#5531

Crawf-Hirdy podcast (this week I think) Crawford said when Clarkson started he showed the players what the team would be in 2 years time. Lots of senior players were missing, including Crawfords, and showed gaps that had to be filled. But he understood that was the reality of the situation.
It depends where we honestly are on the premiership window/clock cycle. And if it has changed by what’s happened so far this season. For a number of reasons we have to take an honest and hard look at the list and "who will be best 22 in 2019-2021, and play/recruit players accordingly. So yes, let’s get a good number of games into the key kids.


#5532

Always a possibility I suppose.


#5533

Last time we played him didn’t he only get 67% of game time as well or something like that?

Even when in it’s 2/3 in.


#5534

That’s sounds dirty!


#5535

would not play him in vfl and midfield


#5536

For me that is the ONLY possible reason why we shouldn’t be giving him games.

I like that theory though, bit left field


#5537

He has had his opportunities. I actually thought his first game this year vs Adelaide was very good, and that he would kick on from there. I would keep playing him, but he put in a poor one and then got dropped.

He does remind me of Melksham in this, Jake would play a good game, then not turn up for a week or three, then pop up in a game with a clever piece of play and roost a goal. If you watch him now, he is very consistent. Maybe better coaching and a a bit older.

Hope you are wrong about Langers, and that he gets a go this week. I love BJ and Bags but they are on the way out, and playing Baguley in the forward line is just nonsense.


#5538

Here ya, Speedy. We’ve underperformed, completely agree. However, I don’t think we ever had the cattle to challenge the top two or three this year… we still need a big bod or two in the midfield who isn’t as slow as treacle, and a couple of slightly bigger, endurance guys, across all lines. If it were up to me (thank fark it’s not) I would’ve treated this year as a development year to get Mutch, Clarke, Begley, Lang, Laverde up to speed for a serious tilt next year. Actually, I would have spent half of last year doing the same thing TBH.

That, to me, has been the biggest coaching/recruiting fark up across the last two seasons. Would’ve also gone after Kennedy at Carlton - been injured so jury still out on him this year, but reckon he looks ok and would’ve got games with us.


#5539

The thought has crossed my mind.

I’m just not sure when he may have advised the club.

If before the JLT game, then it doesn’t make sense why he’d be playing round 1 and 2.

Maybe he advised after the round two game?

Pure speculation though.


#5540

Langford got a new club because he knew his current one would drop him after he told them that :thinking: