#42 Adam Saad

Barrett doesn’t deserve to be referenced by his nickname.

5 Likes

This!!!

HURRY UP AND DO THE DEAL SO I DON’T HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT ALL WEEKEND!

5 Likes

So is it 29 or next years second?

Think next years 2nd.

GC have enough picks this year.

I’d think it would be 29 they are on about.

As I said, a 2nd rnd next year ostensibly holds more value than this years, and would be more helpful in making the Dogs happy.

DO IT

1 Like

Make it GWS’s next year second for the LOLz.

1 Like

Hope we trade our second round next year for Saad then publicly gloat that we made GC take take our one rather than the Giants’ second rounder because we’re finishing higher than GWS.

3 Likes

GET
IT
DONE!

1 Like

Not me. It’s worth more.

Not enough Saad… was hoping it would be done today

On that, why exactly do they call him purple?

Purple-headed junket-pumper?

3 Likes

Because c**t isnt a colour

42 Likes

Because that’s the colour he became when he was beat up regularly at school

Because he’s a d*ck head.

4 Likes

I suspect the Saad deal hasn’t happened because the combination of pick 2’s for the Dogs hasn’t been ratified yet as both Essendon and the Dogs work an agreement to satisfy the Dogs, i.e. who gets the future pick. Mind you, I would’ve thought Essendon could offload both second round future picks because one of those picks comes from GWS?

1 Like

I concur on the 2nd rounders relative to what Dogs want: 24 + either 29 or GWS future 2nd

Likely we won’t want to give up both future 2nd’s due to F/S Fletch however

/fxd

1 Like