#45 Conor McKenna - the first six years

Our media are always disgraceful.
But they print what sells and broadcast what garners listeners.

The media are bad but they’re driven by their audience.


I give it 5 minutes

1 Like

Could some post Robbos article?


WA hub

All clubs hub in WA and play a game on Thursday, game on Friday, 3 Saturday, 3 Sunday and one on Monday

In front of a minimum of 15,000 every game

AFL get $ return plus Covid free state ( 2 active cases quarantined)

Yes, and he gets to kick 3 journos of his choosing in the groin

Making Essendon play Carlton while eight players are in quarantine would threaten integrity of competition

There are three live scenarios for the AFL and Essendon, but only one of them centres on fairness and integrity.

  1. Conor McKenna won’t play against Carlton, and it’s business as usual.

  2. Eight, possibly nine players, join McKenna in isolation and won’t play against the Blues.

  3. Essendon’s entire playing group is ordered into isolation, which means the match against the Blues this week is postponed.

No.1 is obvious and understandable and No.3 is unlikely.

The question of fairness and integrity centres on No.2.

And that’s where Essendon and the AFL are at odds.

The two parties are waiting on instructions from the Department of Health and Human Services — expected Tuesday — on how many players and staff were in “close contact’’ with McKenna and how many of them will need to be isolated.

If it’s the eight players who trained with McKenna pre and post the main training sessions on Friday — which is expected — the AFL is adamant the Bombers will play this week.


For political analysis and opinion like no other. Watch Jones & Credlin with Alan Jones 8pm Tuesdays, Sky News. For more

The AFL’s position is “bad luck”.

The Bombers are not happy.

Conor McKenna trains with teammates including Michael Hurley and Cale Hooker last week.

Kayo is your ticket to the 2020 Toyota AFL Premiership Season. Watch every match of every round Live & On-Demand. New to Kayo? Get your 14-day free trial & start streaming instantly >

They privately say the game should be postponed and incorporated later in the schedule which, they say, was set up to deal with the exact situation which has presented itself.

Basically, where is “agile and flexible’’ when it’s most needed?

Essendon chief executive Xavier Campbell was diplomatic on Triple M on Monday.

“I would like to think we would sit down with the AFL and others and we could work through it so there would be a reasonable outcome.’’

Initially, my feeling was suck it up, Bombers.

But that’s not right and even the conglomerate of Essendon haters should sympathise.

Should Essendon be forced to play without a full side available?

Yes, their player broke the rules

No, it will ruin the season

Because it’s yet to be determined if McKenna actually broke isolation protocols.

What if, by chance, McKenna brought the virus back from Ireland and it laid dormant for a month?

We know he was isolated for 14 days. We know he’s been tested seven times. We know he went to a house inspection(s) which you are allowed to do under the protocols.

And we know he visited his host family, which we believe was after he was tested on Friday, which rules that out as a source.

If fairness is still the cornerstone of integrity in this competition, the Bombers shouldn’t be penalised by being forced to play Carlton without their starting backline.

And not when this predicament might not be their fault.

The season is compromised enough — not least with the hub living for the Western Australian and South Australian teams — without the league handing Carlton this week and possibly Collingwood the week after a massive free kick.

Conor McKenna at Essendon training.

Hands up who wants to play Essendon without Hurley, Hooker, Saad and Redman?

You can’t imagine the other 15 teams will be happy the Blues and Pies get to play an undermanned Essendon and they don’t.

Surely, that stretches the integrity of the competition.

And surely the collegiate environment which has permeated since day one of the shutdown — remember, we’re all in this together — is being tested.

The AFL, however, is unbending.

The league warned all clubs to divide the stars/positional lines across small groups at training in preparation for a positive test and, in this case, the Bombers were foolish enough to lump all their defenders together. So, bugger ya.

The AFL also thinks having eight players in isolation is much of a muchness as having a team hit hard by a flu or St Kilda picking up a virus in China, which happened last season.


Vote now: Should depleted Dons be forced to take on Blues?

Could McKenna’s COVID-19 test be a false positive?

The Tackle: New coach ‘inherited a basket case’

AFL players hit with tough new 48-hour family ban

WA to host 60,000 fans next month

So, we wait for the DHHS.

As it stands, the AFL’s current position is the match is a goer if Essendon has 24 players available for selection, and only if the entire list is locked down will the match be postponed.

The Bombers say they want the match postponed if their eight defenders can’t play.

They aren’t looking for public support on this one, and they probably won’t get it anyhow, but they do want perspective: How would you feel if it was your club?

It’s a fair question.


WA wouldn’t agree to it. That’s why their teams are in Qld.

LOL. I reckon he’ll come of second best if he chooses Caro.

Should have just mysteriously gotten himself stabbed, then it all would have been fine


Give it till Friday watch this space

Perfect opportunity to postpone the season for a 14 day quarantine period for all clubs entering into WA given our club situation aswell atm


Robbo‘a narrative has changed considerably since this morning.


Imagine how ripped up the ground will be after 1 week of that.

Ladies and gentleman, the chief football “writer” of the Herald Sun


I saw this headline and genuinely thought that integrity of the competition would be threatened because we only had 8 players out.

Utilise the old Subiaco Oval aswell

Not as important I suppose, but how does the postponed game against Melbourne (and maybe others) affect the Mark and Goal of the Year award seeming that the votes are put in place each week. Who knows how many other awards etc are affected - all seems to become unfair. What a shambles.

My Christmas in July gift for Clusterf**k Gil


The idea is to get the quarantined teams to play each other during those 14 days.

It doesn’t matter for goal of the year - Smith has already locked that in :wink:

Forgot about that place, that wouldn’t be too bad.