#45 Conor McKenna - the first six years

[rossoneri]

Gaying

Whoops

[rossoneri]

Ah dammit

[Ants]

I’m surprised that the Saints are even thinking about trading with us again after how well the Lovett and Carlisle deals worked out for them.

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

[wimmera1]

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

Concur.
If not how stupid they made themselves look while making it.

[Wanderlust]

I’m surprised that the Saints are even thinking about trading with us again after how well the Lovett and Carlisle deals worked out for them.

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

My boss is a Saints, and regularly says that Carlisle is the only one holding their backline together.

They love him. I’m just waiting for the Honeymoon to be over and for Carlisle to have a massive sulk about playing a position he doesn’t want to play in.

[Ants]

I’m surprised that the Saints are even thinking about trading with us again after how well the Lovett and Carlisle deals worked out for them.

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

My boss is a Saints, and regularly says that Carlisle is the only one holding their backline together.

They love him. I’m just waiting for the Honeymoon to be over and for Carlisle to have a massive sulk about playing a position he doesn’t want to play in.

He wants to play in defence. He’ll probably be AA there soonish.

[barnz]

Who thought playing Carlisle in his preferred position would work…

[Riolio]

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

Concur.
If not how stupid they made themselves look while making it.

I dunno. It did work in their favour to hold out.

[Deckham]

I’m surprised that the Saints are even thinking about trading with us again after how well the Lovett and Carlisle deals worked out for them.

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

Interesting choice of words…

[Deckham]

Who thought playing Carlisle in his preferred position would work…

Not our ■■■■■■ club!

[barnz]

Im putting this on bomber tbh.

[wimmera1]

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

Concur.
If not how stupid they made themselves look while making it.

I dunno. It did work in their favour to hold out.

Did it?
That’s not what I remember, but I am forgetful.

[Paul_Peos]

I’d have thought they’d be pretty ecstatic about the Carlisle trade.

Concur.
If not how stupid they made themselves look while making it.

I dunno. It did work in their favour to hold out.

Carlisle plus Gresham, is so much better than Francis plus Bird.

It’s hilarious that there still lingers a belief that we totally got St Kilda in that trade.

[aboods]

That trade is a great result St Kilda but it could still also be a great result for us if Francis turns into a gun. It solely realise on him.

It was a good move to involve Sydney in that trade

[rossoneri]

What did we give up for pick 6 though? From memory saints got Gresham with the pick they hot from Sydney? So we got pick 5/6 for Carlisle, did we give up anything else?

[Riolio]

Ameet BAINS ain’t no fool

[Come_Back_Hirdy]

• Essendon receives Bird and pick No.5 (Francis), gives up Carlisle and pick No.44 (Tyrone Leonardis), and exchanges pick No.23 (on-traded to WCE (Luke Partington)) for pick No.24 (Alex Morgan);
• St Kilda receives Carlisle and pick No.14 (Gresham) and gives up pick No.5 and pick No.24;
• Sydney Swans receive picks No.23 (Partington) and pick No.44 (Leonardis), and gives up pick No.14 (Gresham) and Bird.

[Birch19]

Essendon

out: Carlisle, Pick 44
in: Pick 5, Craig Bird

St Kilda

out: Pick 5, Pick 23
in: Carlisle, Pick 14

Sydney

out: Craig Bird, Pick 14
in: Pick 23, Pick 44

So effectively we traded Carlisle for Pick 5, and Bird for 44.

[ivan]

Sydney’s end of that still makes no sense to me

[ivan]

Im putting this on bomber tbh.

???