#45 - Tom Edwards - thru 2026

Keep him on the list

Looks our most natural forward on the list

Disgusting how much ruined his momentum on Anzac Day

He is slight but he attacks the contest really well

10 Likes

Edwards is the only one of the four I’d feel comfortable extending his contract period.

7 Likes

I agree. Whilst I don’t want to push Jones Tyers at all, I think he’s shown the last month he might be worth considering on another 12 month deal as a defender. Given Ridley / Reid (durability), Mc Kay (not the future) and Hayes (young + ACL history) they might need some reinforcements and he’s been sort of interesting to watch his work down back to think there’s no harm

1 Like

Cox and unfortunately Jones is contracted for next year

2 Likes

I don’t think Cox is.

I wasnt very clear how I said that I meant, I would keep Cox and unfortunately Jones is contracted for another year so we dont have a choice.

2 Likes

How and why would it be a difficult call to remove Cox, Jones and McMahon?
For too long Essendon has been a safe haven for list cloggers.

1 Like

In HAPs defence I think that Van Unen did play a few VFL games for us.

1 Like

I would keep Edwards and McMahon over Perkins and Jones.

9 Likes

We need to stop handing out charity contracts just because players are good guys or have had a hard run with injuries.

Fact is Edwards has shown nothing at AFL level and at 26yo, thats not good enough for another contract.

Its an easy delist for me.

4 Likes

We can pay Jones out.

2 Likes

I’d ditch all of them and keep Perkins he’s the only one of those players mentioned able to play footy at an acceptable afl level,(even though it’s only occasionally) Spike will sort him out.

3 Likes

I know who Jones is - but who is Jones Tyers ?

1 Like

I’d say he showed a decent amount before being shafted to a wing by idiot Brad Scott and lost all continuity.

12 Likes

I think Jones’ contract makes him safe. That, and they were willing to give him games at the back end of the year – it felt like team selection was heavily influenced by who’s going to be at the club next year.

I think Edwards and McMahon will definitely go. The issue with both of them is that they’re not physical forwards – they’re lead and mark players. They can deputize for Caddy as more limited options, but I don’t think they work alongside him (Kyle Langford, as a similar type forward, certainly didn’t this year). They’ll turn 27 and 25 respectively next year, and I don’t see the case for mature guys who don’t appear to have a ceiling beyond being a back up.

I think Cox probably goes too, but has a better chance of getting a contract if we’re unsuccessful in the trade period. As a key forward, where he’s playing his best football in the VFL, he seems to have similar limitations to Edwards and McMahon. He can play elsewhere, albeit he hasn’t done it very well this year. Overall, the quality of his best games at VFL level and his potential for more versatility nudges him ahead for mine.

The other interesting one is Kayle Gerreyn. I presume the trial in defence is over, and he’d play forward next year if he’s retained. It’s an awkward one, in that they liked his talent to enough to spend a pick in the 30s on him in a very deep draft, but he’s shown very little in his first two years to suggest he’ll be a player. I’d guess he probably gets a one-year deal, but if he doesn’t, Cox’s chances of staying improve.

The other interesting variable is that there’s a handful of key forward prospects that could be in the range of the back end of the first round of the draft / early second second wherre we will have picks (e.g., Jack Pickett, Sam Gayfer, Ethan Herbert, Jack Slattery, Brady Wright). I think one of Cox and Gerreyn survive even if we grab one of those prospects, but I doubt both would.

3 Likes

I would persist with Edwards. He’s ahead of Langford if he puts on more size.

7 Likes

I personally wouldn’t have Langford in my best side as a forward, and I’m not sure he’d be in there anywhere else either – increasingly, he looks like a depth option to me, which could be another factor not in Edwards’ favor.

4 Likes

A few extra list spots or rookie spots courtesy of the AFL would make things interesting for a few of the line ball decisions

I want to keep Gerryen. Great kick. 200cm. Good size and mobility. Forward ruck. I think he trumps others like Cox. Fits the demographic.

13 Likes

I like him, I’d keep him.

He played games off of a knee reco, and played well at times. Has a serious bag of tricks, is a mature head around the club and in the VFL. His taking hangers and such showing kids it ok to have some flair.

I’d keep all of Cox, Gerryn and Edwards on one year deals.

1 Like