He’s 26, so it’s not like he’s going to have the chance to catch up. I’m not expecting players to improve at that age beyond some match fitness after being involved in the AFL system for a pre-season.
I just don’t see what others are seeing, especially the speed. I see him trailing his opponent as much as McKay does.
The reason why he trail in on his opponents is because he’s literally played half a dozen games in defence in his life, and they’re all at AFL level. He’s got an excuse. What’s McKay got? Or Laverde for that matter? He did well tonight, he shows something you can work with.
You’re right, he has an excuse. It still doesn’t mean he’s anything more than a handy depth player. Even good AFL players can struggle past 30, so I am expecting a few years of service and that’s about it. That’s also completely fine for a mid-season draftee.
Lowest footy iq, I’ve seen for some time. Well at least from someone who grew up playing the game, as opposed to like a Draper who did not and it’s kind of expected.
Has some good attibutes. But won’t make it, can’t coach the dumb ■■■■ out of him at this point.
If he can simultaneously fill Goldy’s mature ruck insurance spot, and Lav’s KPD depth spot, thereby allowing us to retire/delist both and freeing up an extra spot, then I’d keep for a year. But that’s about it.
Okay so because we’re not in the window any player over 26 years of age will be incapable of development…righto! I’m sure if Lauchie was reading this he’d argue that he’s still capable of getting better regardless of whether the club that selected him is ready to contend or not. Personal development is mostly up to the individual to action; the club’s role is to facilitate this not do the work for him.
And with the injury prone Reid and McKay, plus Hayes missing a slice of the first part of next season, I think not to retain Blakiston would be fool hardy.