The difference is Merrett is our player and Cotchin is a Brownlow winner. You are right, there is no difference between their behaviours. Zac is lucky he didn’t get two weeks because it was deliberate punch even tho’ he had been scragged all day. The AFL are on a mission to clean up the game, let’s hope they don’t sterilize it too severely.
Neville Crowe missed a grand final and premiership in 1967 for allegedly striking John Nicholls, the FCFC crim, in the guts. Got 4 weeks and Nicholls staged it. No appeals, no insufficient contact, no nothin’ in those days.
Of course we did.
I can imagine it was via a 30 second phone convo.
Gil: Hi guys, hear you are looking at appealing Zacs verdict
EFC: As a matter of fact yes, we believe it should be down graded to low impact
Gil: That’s fine, im all for transparency and in the pursuit of fairness I’m happy for you to proceed with the appeal.
EFC: Thanks for understanding Gil
Gil: No worries, by the way I’ve just checked the umpiring schedule and have seen that Fisher and Pannell have been appointed to all your remaining fixtures, not sure how that happened.
EFC: We withdraw our appeal
judd got 3 weeks for deliberately inserting his fingers into someones eye socket. zach got 2 (brought down to one) for hitting someone with a drunken backyard cricket style cheap shot to the gut.
maybe going back a bit, but yup, you get the idea. salty af.