Yes, but you are using that to build your case that our list has flaws.
Because our list has flaws
and for 30 years everyone was right about the dogs/tigers.
you’re also using a one off (2 off in this case) to dismiss an argument.
As does every other list.
For all we know we could win the flag next year.
Every list has flaws, but are they flaws you can live with.
For Tigers, the answer is yes, they built a game style around their deficiencies.
For us, it’s becoming impossible to continue until we fix it.
Make no mistake though, the tigers are short on talls and will fix that up this year, this is the draft for it.
The thing is that we don’t draft to fix our flaws, other teams do. Our midfield has been a flaw for over a decade and it’s continually ignored. Small defenders are ignored for flankers, crumbing/pressure forwards are ignored for flankers. Everything’s ignored for tweeners.
I rated them at their peak I guess, clearly Stanton at his best was A grade. Licka for a year was an elite forward. So was Davey for a time.
But none were A-grade at the same time and had greatly declined at the end.
Realistically though the balance of the list could be fixed in one draft/trade period. Whether we’d have quality in all places is another matter, but it would be easy to fix the balance if 8 or 10 of the right players are turned over and replaced by the right types
Any idea how much say the coaching panel has in that decision?
If Joel Selwood is available at our first pick, we’ll still take Scott Gumbleton.
Because list balance is over rated.
I actually think the coaching changes are part of the problem, over the last 10 years we have several coaches with different ideas on game style and we drafted to suit those visons
Then we hung onto guys we liked as people if they didn’t exactly fit the current coaches style.
I truly believe it’s development not drafting that is killing us. Disco from the outside seems to of picked very well.
For some reason the club seems to really struggle with the development of players. He can only pick them I highly doubt he has any say on if they get picked each week.
For instance he might of chosen Langford as a mid. But the coaches lay him at half forward. Then eventually swap him into the midfield, then don’t pick him.
You can’t blame that on the recruiter.
He picked up 3 guys who have all been serviceable or in the case of saad really good, or in the case of Smith fantastic. From memory he gave up very little in return.
Back him in, and pour more resources into development
Will be interesting.
With the picks we traded we could gave had Tim Kelly and James Worpell and a rd 2 pick in '18 deaft (supposedly a strong draft).
Langford played most of his junior footy as 3rd tall forward
I’m a Jackets fan, but I would be worried if we finish with a pick somewhere 2-4 that Jackets would take one of the King twins over the best available mid.
The whole middle could be fixed, as someone said earlier if Clarke and Langford come on.
Yep I agree. Give them til the end of the year and I reckon they’ll be solid best 22 players at the start of next season
And a half back. And if you include school football, an anywhere he was needed utility.