Sooooo… did anyone watch the ‘Q Clash”? My understanding was they were simply going to split the ground length-wise four times rather than three — i.e. no new angles.
Next they can go to five blades umps and try something actually different: one in the middle and 4 as the flanks/pockets. That way they’d actually see what happens crowd/boundary-side.
Sooooo… did anyone watch the ‘Q Clash”? My understanding was they were simply going to split the ground length-wise four times rather than three — i.e. no new angles.
Next they can go to five blades umps and try something actually different: one in the middle and 4 as the flanks/pockets. That way they’d actually see what happens crowd/boundary-side.
Remember how Mark Evans was going to fix football?
and every sycophant in the media was sucking his ■■■■ when he started, all because he did a few fluffy radio interviews. are they ever proactive with any decisions re: the game? it’s always a knee jerk reaction to media pressure and over reaction. ■■■■■■■ pillocks.
Many of you probably get the afl FAN FOCUS email surveys. The Current one is ■■■■■■ disturbing. The questions relate to all the key media personnel, who do you trust most etc. this is how they intend to shape average Joe in the street.
Should the afl really be this interested and concerned who the most trusted mouth pieces are?
Finding out who the most trusted journalists are in preparation for the next occasion where they need to smear/destroy a person/club’s reputation through the media through humiliating and damaging leaks. That’s AFL forward planning.
Many of you probably get the afl FAN FOCUS email surveys. The Current one is ■■■■■■ disturbing. The questions relate to all the key media personnel, who do you trust most etc. this is how they intend to shape average Joe in the street.
Should the afl really be this interested and concerned who the most trusted mouth pieces are?