When there’s a bad bounce, I think the 666 rule resets as the bad bounce is the umpire’s fault, but when the bounce is good and the players create the need for a secondary bounce, there’s a difference.
As cynics like me and 100000 others have said, wait for subsequent rules to fix this new rule.
So many questions: why worse than kickouts? Will they be forced to slow the game by moving to the middle of the ground, and will play on or advantage be paid if they do otherwise? How is the 9m measured — per an (invisible?) extension of the top line of the goal square, or per a 9m radius from the centre of the goals (presumably not marked)?
And most importantly of all, is this actually in the rules? Has it been distributed to the clubs? Or is it an “interpretation”?
It actually seemed to work reasonably well on Thursday night with basically the ump pulling the player on the mark back which opened up angles a smidge. There wasn’t the drama about setting the mark that I perhaps expected.
Reckon it will take half a season to see the results of the 6-6-6 - Traditionally the first three or four rounds of a season produce higher scoring, until teams have perfected their defensive tactics.
So surprise surprise the AFL 12 person executive took home $10.73m last year including $3.56m in bonuses. I wonder how much of this was linked to AFLX? The executive includes people with titles including General Manager - Strategy and General Manager- Social Policy.
The total AFL staff bill for 2018 was $107.4m against total revenues of $778m. It’s a joke this organisation isn’t taxed on the basis it’s not for profit except if your name is Gil.