So much revisionism in ‘history’ that causes half the farking issues on our planet, and people are worried about whether footy ‘originated’ from the Irish or the locals …wgaff? Let’s strike it from the record, shall we? Put uppity people back in their place, what? We didn’t conquer this sunny land just so that the origins of our sport be hijacked and claimed by indigenous upstarts! Someone needs a good thrashing, I do say!
But high marking was not a feature of our game in 1878. Essendon’s Charlie "Commotion: Pearson was the first to take hangers and that was in the mid-1880s.
Because there’s bugger-all evidence to suggest it?
It’s not odd.
It’s not racist.
I’d love Australian Rules to have a thousands year-old history, but it just ain’t so.
One of the creators of the code met some people who met some people who played kick-to kick with a stuffed possum?
And we’ll disregard all the rugby stuff.
And all the other people who codified the rules.
There’s also a pretty long bow that white Australians were taking all that many social cues from the indigenous.
There were still slaughters happening at that point.
Eh. Fair point.
I’m saying Marn Grook probably wasn’t.
I’d like it if it were, but I have a hard time believing that when they worked out the game anyone was thinking, ‘How about this thing I heard someone tell me about once? That sounds good.’
And it’s me that has an issue with, ‘Who knows? Maybe it was, maybe it wasn’t. Let’s not and pretend we did.’
There’s much better evidence that the AFL wants to whitewash it’s history with indigenous australia than there is any evidence it grew from there.
It’s a bit of a leap to suggest Tom Wills borrowed from an indigenous game to start his game - then didn’t bother inviting any of them to play it.
Particularly when we know he was involved in organising indigenous cricket teams.