Australian Policies -- 2026, and we have no Shadow Cabinet

Nah. The whole point is to pander to arseholes by telling them that their arseholishness is actually virtue.

You’re not racist, you’re a defender of western civilisation.
You’re not an authoritarian sadist, you’re in favour of strong traditional law enforcement.
You’re not greedy and corrupt, you’re a go-getting entrepreneur with hustle who believes in the free market
You’re not an antivax cooker, you’re a sturdy independent free thinker
You’re not a climate change denier, you’re a courageous maverick against groupthink, defending Australian blue collar jobs

They’re selling the idea can be the hero without having to recognise or address your own flaws. In fact, they’re telling you never had flaws at all. Everyone else was wrong. Self-congratulation is a hell of a drug.

7 Likes

also it hits really hard when you’re stupid

its the 2020s version of ‘you will become a billionaire youre just unlucky until now’ part of the american dream

2 Likes

Labor held outer suburban seats are a chance for ON. Plus regional but main game for them is getting BOP in the senate. Imagine a Labor government and a senate controlled by ON. It’d be a daily circus.

When I first read that, I thought it was just a general reference.

But then I kept reading the following posts and found that it clearly applies to several posters in this thread.

(Who will of course deny such an accusation…but their posts are very supportive of ON).

1 Like

This cant happen.

In a situation where ON has a reasonable number of senate seats it means labour would need to deal with Liberals, Greens or ON. ON wouldn’t have a balance of power as it’s traditionally known, as there would be many different permutations of getting things passed.

If tmyoubwant to know there appealing to, and if Pauline and all her lackies aren’t trying to make a buck off this venture. Just head to their website and check out all the merchandise targeting the cookers.

My favourite is the Flick the UN (written to look like ■■■■, oh I did giggle just like I was 9 years old again)

**Emblasoned with a straightforward message, this shirt reflects a stance on international governance and the desire for transparency and accountability.

In a time where global narratives are questioned, wearing this tee is an assertion of the importance of national sovereignty and the value of Australian standards. It’s not just apparel; it’s a conversation about the future of global interaction.**

And as someone pointed out, you can’t be a ‘hero’ fighting for everyone without your slogan on a stubby holder.

And of course there’s magalite

and no digital ID, like no one is asking for

Do they have a F UCK-WITS R US bumper sticker?

2 Likes

It looks like it’s sold out!

Its 30 % of whoever the hell was polled. It is voting intention as of now, no policy no costing whatsoever, so it is based on a sample of who knows what and who, I am guessing it is a protest at the state of current politics, and the insane media frenzy on how bad everything is. We keep gettting hammered by the media and facebook about how bad things are and how it’s all just strangely happened in the last 18 months.

Its absolute nonsense.

I will bet anything this wont hold up to any sensible scrutiny over time.

Most of this surge has come directly from a poor to non functional LNP, sure some is dissafected labor, but the vast majority is one side of the right leaking to the other.

It makes no sense from where they were a year ago and isnt sustainable, and a lot of this is indonesian bot farm facebook driven IMO. The media is getting so much delight from this they are pretty much encouraging it. I reckon in time they will lock in and start to make them accountable, for now they are enjoying this and dont really want it to end yet

Is there money in that?

Colour me sceptical…

1 Like

One Nation to media is the same as using Essendon for clicks.

1 Like

@Mods …please issue a permaban on @Soulnet for his post above.

I know that Essendon is bad…like really bad…but comparing them to ON is just a step too far.

@Soulnet needs to go!!!

1 Like

2 Likes

@theDJR: Thoughts?

2 Likes

Further to explaining the rise of ON and the middle finger at the government and LNP, here’s a great insight explaining the shift in disposable incomes post 2022.

1 Like

Again…what are ON going to do to improve that for the average Australian?

I know we’re on a bit of a loop about this, but while affordability and the drop in real income is a genuine issue and has certainly contributed to the loss of voter share among the traditional major parties, it doesn’t explain the rise of One Nation specifically, vs all the other alternative options out there.. One Nation has in fact consistently opposed most cost of living measures.

3 Likes

The honesty police in here must have missed this one:

https://www.news24.com.au/politics/australian-politics/one-nation-refuses-to-comment-after-victorian-candidate-caught-misrepresenting-qualifications/news-story/a77bec5e4ae011a0f8323fb61535fe76

Pretty sure that’s at least the second one.

It seriously can’t be that hard to just recruit an ex-mayor.

They shouldn’t just attract, and accept, lying scumbags.

1 Like