I like these developments. When do we start doing league stuff again?
I will post some dates shortly. Trades are open for business at the moment - with a caveat we are yet to see UF’s final positions. Past experience suggests they basically conform with those allocated by Champion Data, especially for those players already in the AFL system.
Team Score Result_words Opponent Score Round Result Year
Birch19 1432 Defeated TrevorBix 997 16 W 2012
Birch19 1386 Defeated TrevorBix 1194 11 W 2013
Birch19 1287 Defeated TrevorBix 1165 5 W 2014
Birch19 1292 Lost to TrevorBix 1455 14 L 2015
Birch19 1335 Lost to TrevorBix 1352 16 L 2016
Yeah my chart is wrong., OOPS. Ignore for a day until I fix it.
I am all for this idea if its a major injury and missing 16 weeks. Even if they only get some assistance for 8 weeks. You have to keep the player in your keeper 20. Or at least keep one player until he comes back from injury.
Need some concensus on a rule - can we LTI list players we trade for? I think we have said no to placing players we draft straight on LTI list.
Against changing this rule. If you trade for a player on LTI, you take him knowing he has an injury.
Understand your point. My arguement against it is that allowing this to occur could mean more trades occur. My view is that more trades mean more interaction which in the end leads to more engagement of all coaches.