please refer to my original post.
It in no way excuses the response. The response is criminal.
But he did incite a riot and he cannot be excused for that.
please refer to my original post.
It in no way excuses the response. The response is criminal.
But he did incite a riot and he cannot be excused for that.
My point is we often play innocent or blamelessā¦as this thread is showing.
Pizzer payback eh?
I would have done it to the Prikk too.
It was a comeback?? ā¦
Enough said.
One poster is saying leave it to the offcials another is saying you would have done worse.
If so you would have no issue with the response then from the Philippines players then?
thatās what I thought.
I have no issue to him responding to the initial hit on our player from that dirty little prikk, no.
Just shouldnāt have raised the forearm, ā¦ but in the heat of the moment after what occurred, Iād have probably done the same.
You know what thought thought, ā¦
How big is the chip on this countryās shoulder that we try to make ourselves the bad guys in this?
Iām glad those players are out of that country, and I hope we have the balls to refuse to ever go back.
And I mean ever.
You said it yourself. He shouldnāt have raised his elbow in a blow that could have broken a jaw, was provoked by little and got Barry Hall 7 weeks.
Nothing that followed is remotely justified by Kickerts actions but sometimes itās best just to be a little restrained.
You do see what the prikk did to our bloke, first, ā¦ right??
How big is our chip that we see ourselves beyond reproach.
We do nothing wrong. Carry on.
the flop?
please. I see that every week in Monday ball at MSAC. I should elbow someone with force to the jaw?
Did you see the ā ā ā ā ā ā ā gang stomp?
Now youāre being completely disingenuous, ā¦ but, carry on.
shocking. I agree 100%.
iām not.
With my first post, or my second post?
No??
Wims post.
What happened after the Kickert hit was criminal and charges should come out of this.