I like our current one a lot and think it has held up remarkably well for something made almost 20 years ago. So I am neither here or there in terms of feeling we need to update it. Getting a proper re-brand is not cheap too. And like someone else previously said, we are probably footing the bill for WB as god knows they don't have the money for something surplus like this.
However, if we did look at re-branding I like these ideas...
I should also state though that given we have always been represented by a bomber plane that we should probably still stick with that. I just like the angle the above designers have taken with 'Bombers'.
I kind of like the current one but have always disliked the fact that it's pointing down.
Especially over the past 10 years or so when we've performed so poorly...it's like we're diving to the bottom of the ladder.
Our logo is great, don’t break what isn’t fixed… Or something similar. Someone mentioned there were other options before we took the current one? Was before my time, did it go to a vote or something?
I have an old Essendon tee shirt with a bomber logo on it. I don't wear it anymore cos the limage is flaking. The bomber is a Lancaster bomber from WWII and it looks ■■■■■■ fantastic. A bit of real heritage and history, better I think than some generic jet.