Changes: Round 3 Dogs

Very well said.

But we’ve all been burnt so many times by this club in this same situation. How anybody could confidently tip us this week is either a) completely delusional, b) has a very short & selective memory on how these fixtured games have played out in the past or c) both a and b.

The last few years under Sheedy… Knights… Hird… now Worsfold… always the same. Totally engrained in club culture now to screw these games up. Could have Jock McHale, John Coleman, Norm Smith, Ron Barrassi (all in their prime) coaching us this week and we would find a way to make this very, very difficult.

Nothing to do with just ‘bad luck’. We’re just sh*t in this situation.

Tippa’s loss of form over that period strongly correlates to Fantasia’s absence from the side.

My view: Fantasia was drawing the oppositions’ best small defender; but, with him out injured, Tippa now does and is struggling to overcome the higher quality defender he is pitted against.

8 Likes

Dogs also lost Trengove (Cracked shoulder blade) and Roughead (Concussion) is in doubt.

Id love an excuse to play Long, but Tippa won us the Adeladie, and dealing with the best small defender, hard to drop him IMO.

What if we dropped Hartley and played Ridley.

B: Saad Hooker Ridley
HB: McKenna Hurley McGrath
C: Zaharakis Heppell Smith
HF: Tippa Daniher Stewart
F: Fantasia Stringer Green
R: Bellchambers Z Merrett Parish
Int: Goddard, Langford Begley, Clarke
Emg: Long, Guelfi, Hartley

Outs - Browne, Dea, Hartley
Ins - Fantasia, Clarke, Ridley

2 Likes

McNeice is probably a better kick of the footy.

Tory Dickson to kick 5

not saying no changes, but the week before against Adelaide people liked/were impressed by how Browne, Dea, Hartley played. Three changes to the backline is a lot. And to start off with Hooker back is not going to happen.

It’s going to be an interesting selection to see how the coaches are viewing the team.

Joe and Hooker to kick 10.

2 Likes

Dea is probably our best option for Dickson at the moment.

4 Likes

Have to agree with a lot of people posting. We are not going to win a premiership with Dea, Hartley And Brown in our backline. A good defence can carry one maybe two for a few games but not all 3. It’s time to blood the kids and/or move Hooker back as we have lots of forward option now.

But our biggest problem remains contested ball winning and I’m increasingly frustrated that we do not target any contested ball players in the draft/trades. Then when we do get one, we baby them through their first 2-3 years of development.

Just look at Parish. We were forced to play him in his first year and he developed a lot, then when the players returned from suspension despite clearances being a huge problem we play him in the forward pocket more often then on the ball.

Then we pick McGrath and play him in defence for an entire year. While yes he was impressive back there thats a year he could have been learning to play in an AFL midfield winning clearances.

Most worrying is our trend for going for outside midfielders and still not spreading as well as freemantle did on the weekend. There was clearly an attitude problem last week, the team just didnt show up.

3 Likes

In: Baguley
Out: Brown

Unless Fantasia is good to go.

Whynott at this stage? It’s not like the guelf in class will be too mutch and his game ridleyed with errors - he might even go bezerk and kick a few long goals if he hits a purple patch.

Ahhhhh.

5 Likes

No changes likely. Raz surely not match fit?
Brown out, McNeice or Redman in would be what my worthless choice would be.

Some players just come straight back in. Raz is one of them for us…as long as there is no risk of doing another injury!

1 Like

Anyone heading to the training session today?? Key to see if Fantasia does the full session! Would love for him to come back.

I miss the training reports. We always win in those. :sweat_smile:

5 Likes

Dickson will kick 5 minimum

When will everybody realise posting a team with Hooker back is a futile exercise, it won’t happen.

8 Likes

I think the reason is that Hooker keeps on getting put in the back line by the supporters is that he is a very good defender which we dont have a lot of.

What we do have a lot of is good forwards.

And we have average mids…

I dont know about you but if you keep losing centre clearances then you need good defenders to get up to the forward line…but i’m just a passionate supporter who watches nearly every AFL game…so what would I know

Put Hooker back where he will have the biggest impact…simple as that

5 Likes

Problem with that comment is it’s highly debatable.
It’s been 4 years since Hooker was an AA Defender.

He’d still be very capable, I have no doubts there, but would his value surpass what he does for our forward line ?

1 Like