Welcome back sorfed.
Glad you did, I like arguing with you.
1 Like
Thanks.
1 Like
Seeing as weāre talking about industry messagingā¦as soon as I saw the āChevron, we agreeā ad campaign, I thought it was comically bad!
Anyway I just did a google image search on āchevron we agreeā and found that it had indeed been turned into various memes.
Here are a few:
1 Like
No doubt you would love to have banned what you donāt agree with. It provides an easier path for your views.
That view reminds me of another time in history.
Please provide quotes of my vicious and continuous abuse together with dates.
Well done and hopefully they have been able to patch you up and give you many good years ahead!
At least you contribute to the discussion (even if you are fundamentally wrong & a notorious cherrypicker).
Donāt flatter yourself. Differing views are welcome & yours easily dismissed. Its you people find disagreeable.
Congratulations on making it through.
Seriously.
I hope you could thank the scientists who made your treatment and survival possible.
And not think they were peddling cardiac treatments for the $$$.
thread needs some humour:
6000 years ago, Antartica didnāt have an ice cap.
Well I spent 10 days at Palm Cove, nice place to live and probably die.
Source? You canāt put information up on this website without a source.
Even though it did, to this day it amazes me that the best argument people have boils down to "itās been hot before so itās not us doing itā.
It still amazes me nobody can accurately quantify the anthropogenic fraction of climate change yet they argue targets, even āstop climate changeā.
Go Bombers.
Cherry picker? Pick a subject and we will go at it.
But wait until Iām out.
Just remember not to call me a denier, the correct term when we are refering to the Green religion is heritic
It still amazes me that nobody can accurately quantify the fraction of the babyās unhappiness that is due to it having been thrown into the campfire, yet they still argue fire safety, even ātake the baby out of the fire!ā
3 Likes
The whole line on Climate Change (which was renamed from Global Warming/AnthropogenicGlobal Warming/Catostrophic Global Warming ) was because the global temperature stubbornly refused to rise after 1998 in line with the computer projections. By 2003 HADCRUT and NOAA where in a panic which led to the bastardisation of science and started readjusting historical data.
About a week ago they discovered just how much the records in 3 stations have been āadjustedā and more importantly how.
The program and the original temerature records are now in the hands of a large number of heretics who are processing them.
The ā ā ā ā is about to hit the fan.
1 Like
Iām sure it is.