RHere we go insults again because someone tries to bring reason to some if the statements made here.
Remember the Why River fire from a couple years ago…you know the one that took out hundreds of houses in the Otways…burnt for weeks before hitting the town Wim…CFA couldn’t get to it…then nearly took out the whole town.
Just because people don’t toe the company line is no reason to call them names. Happy to discuss face to face key board warrior else change the threads name to something else
The article you posted literally made the comparison between historical fires and firefighting.
I think it’s interesting that you can’t see that.
Never mind that it’s something that’s really kind of obvious, they went out of their way to point it out.
And your response is, ‘firefighting doesn’t do anything.’
I think that’s worthy of an insult.
Because someone who actually believes that…I mean, I’d give you the benefit of the doubt and say you didn’t consider it, but you did.
And you doubled down on it.
You don’t know me, where I farking live or what I do smartarse. Until you do, you and Wim can go fark yourselves and stick your one sided views where the sun doesn’t shine.
For the record, I live in the actual bush, not in a town or city, but on a farm in the Otways, one of the worst, if not the worst places to get a bushfire…cheers
So now I’m a drunk…everyone that takes a position of non human climate change evilness is a liar, an imbecile, a drunk, a luddite, can’t spell so must be dumb etc etc.
Try reading your our words, so invested in your own self importance & opinions that you need to do the above to shut people down. The reason the majority of people don’t trust man made climate alarmists is because thats what you do…pathetic, elitist and self defeating.
The consensus in the scientific community (a group known for their evidence driven approach) that climate change is happening and being driven by the actions of humankind.
Or
A large group of fossil fuel energy companies and their lobbiests who have large amounts of money and future profit to protect who tell us that the scientists are all wrong.
It seems to me to be a pretty simple equation. What am I missing?