I’m not setting out to bag the coaches - rather I’m trying to examine their philosophy in a constructive manner.
The “Blue Collar” philosophy which has been put forward as the bedrock of our system.
This gets a big tick from me. The question is how is training attempting to implement this strategy?
We saw the lack of physical effort against St. Kilda followed by an appalling game against Geelong.
- To my mind there is too much theoretical attention given to how we will move the ball downfield EXECUTED WITH TOO LITTLE PRESSURE at training.
I accept that we don’t want to incur further injuries at training, but we must learn to execute our skills/game plan under pressure and we must PRACTICE exerting pressure much more strongly.
- Extra man at the contest or extra man loose in defence?
Many of you have pointed this dilemma out. To my mind the extra at the contest is NOT working. We get beaten at the contest, the opposition handballs it to the defender, who then feeds the loose man down the ground.
IF THIS PHILOSOPHY IS NOT WORKING BE FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO CHANGE IT.
- To tag or not to tag?
Lachie Neale killed us on Saturday. The coach explained their deliberate decision not to tag.
“We decided not to because we wanted to still keep a bit of flow and attack in our game.”
They made a thoughtful decision which showed they were aware of the problem which is reasonable. However, it didn’t work, it was clearly the wrong decision.
IF THIS PHILOSOPHY IS NOT WORKING BE FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO CHANGE IT.
I would add that the “blue collar” approach here would be to tag strongly.
- Goalkicking.
There was an obvious lack of scoreboard pressure because we missed easy, straightforward, shots at goal. I don’t need to list them.
There is a lot of goal kicking practice at training – much of it interspersed with drills throughout the session. No doubt this is partly to simulate the pressure of kicking when you are fatigued which makes sense.
However, it is obvious that we are deficient in this area – some players much more than others in terms of accuracy and distance.
IF THIS PHILOSOPHY IS NOT WORKING BE FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO CHANGE IT.
To my mind this area needs much, much more time devoted to it. I think few would disagree with getting an expert like Lloyd to come and oversee a specific programme with the biggest offenders taking multiple shots at goal until they improve.
MY MESSAGE TO THE COACHES IS “BLUE COLLAR” TICK, BUT BE FLEXIBLE AND RE-EXAMINE SOME OF YOUR FUNDAMENTAL PHILOSOPHIES.