I don’t have a problem with his keeping, but he doesn’t have the ability to bat at 120 when it’s required.
And where he bats, it’s pretty much always required.
So he’s gotta go.
No offence meant.
Writing was a bit over the top and repetitive but certainly agree with the premise.
Ball lands within the wide lines?
Hit the batsman other than bat/glove?
Would have gone on to hit the stumps?
Bring on the Brett Lee chainsaw I say.
I’d agree but I wouldn’t allow guys bowling round the wicket into the back of a batsman’s pads with a packed leg side field. Game could get pretty defensive.
As a left hand bowler, i got sick of being turned down for pitching outside leg, even when it pitched on leg.
One bit I don’t agree with now is saying the ball pitches outside leg when any part of it lands in line. Saved the Jaapies a test in Adelaide a couple of years back when Clarke had Faf given, and reversed on review because part of the ball pitched outside leg. They did change that bit later to say half the ball but too late.