Yeah, not what Smith is saying. He’s saying that’s what Nevill needs to bring to his game to add more value to the team. He wants 11 components performing as close to their optimum as possible. The keeper is in the thick of the action all the time and Smith doesn’t want a wallflower, he wants someone who is going to get involved.
Always pick the better guy with the gloves first and foremost and Nevill still is a million times better than Wade in that regards. Nice to have a keeper who can bat a bit but I’d take a keeper averaging 25-30 with the bat and reliable behind the stumps over a guy averaging 50+ who is poor behind the stumps
I’m just guessing but he might be sticking up for his mate. Wade and Phil Hughes were pretty close so I guess he would have spent a lot of time with Clarke.
Agree. He had to deal with Warne turning it at right-angles on fourth and fifth-day pitches and never embarrassed himself. Was excellent ‘keeping to the quicks as well. A very fine gloveman who worked hard at that aspect of his game.
But Warnie and Chappelli are, even before Warne joined the Ch.9 commentary team. Ian doesn’t miss an opportunity to sink the boot into Steve Waugh and he probably doesn’t even rate Gilly in his top ten. They stick together this lot.
I’m not a big fan of Steve Waugh’s captaincy. Sent teams in to bat on good decks, and enforced the follow-on whenever he was able…purely because we were so much better than everybody else. I was surprised more bowlers didn’t break down.
He had a big year to start his career, and has been decidedly average to ordinary ever since. He was probably equal favourite with Renshaw to replace Burns last year, but just couldn’t buy a run.
He’s never going to open for Australia in red-ball cricket. You’d rather that Hughes, who is a prospect, opened in his natural position. Maddinson and Warner are too alike.