Anything current?
Only a young bloke then.
I have been on Boards and Committees that were all old white blokes over 60, Boards with a mixture of genders again ready for the Pension, and one or two with people below 40.
You try to pick a Board that offers a wide range of experience, and deep skills in key areas. Having expert advice is often critical to making good Board decisions. So ideally you want a Board with diversity. Essendon Board is currently a reasonable mix, perhaps needs more younger people and more females.
What Paul Weston had to say was completely on the money. But talk is cheap, it is what you do that counts.
Guelfi playing coach?
Iād say Welsh angling for the top job on the back of another 2 former players challenging for the board.
But thatās just my viewpoint, maybe Iām wrong.
Not sure if Welsh coming on board represents any instability or disunity
Ran a sports store for 30 years
But what exactly does the long haul look like. The lack of specifics is the issue. I have no idea what the long haul looks like. Itās all just we need stability and weāll return to being successful. That doesnāt quite cut it for me. I want to know what that stability will result in. How will the stability return us to success?
Couldnāt agree more.
Thank god for the clean out and finally some clear air from Dodoro. Seems to me we can finally see some direction on and off the field and some sensible list management decisions.
I might be in the minority here, but Iām expecting further incremental improvements on field with more by in from the players and the personal to implement the game plan and Iām pretty positive for next year (will be exciting with all the new players) and beyond.
Thereās bugger all on field to indicate āsteps in the right directionā and more negative than positive.
I get the optimism and hope. Good on you but on field is the opposite. Iām not getting my hopes up until I actually see sustained performance - let alone sustained success
Still love going to the footy though!!
Yep thatās the thing our club is a mess and we needed some one experinced like Brad to try and fix
Just like we needed āsomeone experiencedā post-saga?
So, heās authoritive. OK. Can he actually coach though? Two years in, and the signs donāt look great. All the criticisms at Norf (team selection, autocratic methods, match day coaching) are still on-show. Our defensive game is still atrocious.
Another year in 2025 like the last two (no discernable game plan, abject team selections, handling of young players, post bye fadeouts) and very serious questions will (and should) be asked. I accept heās had to work with the dogshit list that Dodo gave us, but three years of no progress would not be a good sign at all.
Defence leaks, canāt defend transition, canāt hold the ball forward, pathetic delivery into forward line, players played out of position.
Itās just a dogs breakfastā¦. Apart from press up what is the game plan??
Mick Malthouse had 6 years at the dogs, before he won premierships at both West Coast & Collingwood.
Mark Thompson & Damian Hardwick both took 8 years at well resourced clubs to get their teams to win a premiership.
Leigh Matthews took 4 years at Collingwood, and two years at Brisbane.
McRae took two years at Collingwood
Sheedy took 3 years, so I expect Scott to win us a flag in 2025 or fark him off.
Brad Scott coached for 10 years at the worst resourced club in the league. A club that struggled to attract players. Iād view that he did pretty well considering he had two arms tied behind his back.
Mick Malthouse had 6 years at the dogs, before he won premierships at both West Coast & Collingwood.
Mark Thompson & Damian Hardwick both took 8 years at well resourced clubs to get their teams to win a premiership. Sometimes it just takes time & the right players.
The list and development has been crap. Finally there is a president doing something about those issues but you canāt change those things quickly if you donāt have the players to implement your game plan, but there are steps in the right direction. Sorry you canāt see it.
Okay, good luck with that one
Iām just a dumb dumb who ācanāt see itā.
Itās all just we need stability and weāll return to being successful.
No one is saying that.
You need stability in a club to help set up the foundation to target success.
Turbulent clubs have less chance.
The saga period is a good example.
President, CEO, Coaches, Footy Department off doing their own thing which created turbulence- the club nearly died.
Vozzo appears to be in the early stages of re gluing this club together.
CEO that has no experience in the role appoints List Manager with no experience in the roleā¦ta da!
How will the stability return us to success?
Depends what position you play them.
CEO Vozzo (as in the former West Coast list manager, player manager, general manager of football and Football senior legal counsel)
Its a fair resume to become a CEO and to hire a list manager
Yep, thatās the one - a āfairā resume to take on the role
Cant wait until Weston gets on the board and fills the club up with sheedy disciples. Weāre so fked
I must admit Iām not on the Weston train. I just donāt see why Essendon should be going back to champions of 40 years ago. Itās not 1980ās anymore. I think heās yesterdayās man.
Yes, he stands for culture, leadership and other terrific attributes. However so does Barham and the existing Board. I see no demonstrable evidence Paul Weston would be any more successful on the Board. He was a terrific footballer but that doesnāt mean heād be a good Director.
You either have belief the new regime has made necessary systemic and transformational change or you donāt. If you have faith in Vozzo and the footy dept then going to the likes of Paul Weston makes no sense and only serves to destabilise the Club.
Solomon is from a modern era so makes more sense in that heās recently been in the game. I can understand why some would support his candidacy. But going back to Weston would be reckless and senseless and I donāt think would help Essendon succeed any faster.