Dunkley to take us to the promised land (at a later date)

Football Discussion Trade week Duursma head in
21

We got a contracted gun with 2 years left on his contract to come across we are going to need to pay overs

1 Like
22

Probably is the money. I’ll take it.

23

Guys, the WB flat out won’t trade him. Unless we give up something absolutely absurd

6 Likes
24

Remember when we injected our players with unknown substances giving them carte blanche to bend us over and do with us as they please?

2 Likes
25

I’ve seen him play, and I like him, but he wasn’t picked in the midfield this year in a side that finished 7th.

So we need to be very very careful we don’t overpay here

1 Like
26

Fair to say that the Dogs have nobody to blame but themselves that they find themselves in this situation.

If the reports are accurate and we are offering him 600k a year then what the hell were Dogs paying him.

He’s clearly still mostly potential but when he comes out of contract he will be 25 and still probably playing 4th fiddle behind their current midfield lineup.

At the Bombers he will be number 1 and with far greater opportunity to become a star of the comp making his next deal far greater.

1 Like
27

What if the trade involved Langford?

3 Likes
28

Ouch.

1 Like
29

Sold!!

2 Likes
30

If we are any chance of winning a flag then Dunks and Langford will need to run the show.

I can think of a blonde forward flank that could be useful in the Doggies setup though.

1 Like
31

laters stringer

1 Like
32

Not sure ho much value Cahill really has, but worth asking i suppose.

2 Likes
33

JD3

34

I thought Jimmy Stewart was your other boy.

35

He’s more strawberry blonde

1 Like
36

Give them the pick 8 from Carlton & Zaharakis, throw in Gleeson and get a couple of 2nd rounders & Dunkley.

Bargain!

Actually throw in Laverde as well.

37

And what about Dunkley’s brother?

38

Dunking Dodonuts.

2 Likes
39

What about him?

40

Dunkley will be a terrific acquisition. Really good get.

2 Likes