I wonder if he is a holocaust denier as well. What a goon. What he totally fails to consider or acknowledge for one second is that fighting and winning the two World Wars affords him the freedom and opportunity to develop such ludicrous theories. Had the Nazis won WW2, Europe and the rest of the world would be completely different, one big concentration camp.
Doesnât look like heâs old enough to shave.
Much like the DOGE kids, itâs all edgelord â â â â .
You are just trotting out bogeyman points.
His claim is this:
This is not a fringe position in the study of history. Hitler certainly claimed to not want to take Great Britain, and he did say they could keep their colonies. The US did provide a lot of aid with significant conditions that effectively bankrupted the British empire post WW2.
Iâm not suggesting Churchill was wrong for fighting the Nazis, but England did lose a lot. They lost their empire, and handed over the keys to the world to the Americans. As an Aussie do I care? Not particularly, we did alright. As a Brit, would I be â â â â â â . Probably. You win a war but lose an empire. Sounds fair.
I am aware of his points. You and he would be relying on Hitler to keep his word, l wouldnât trust him or a second.
They would have lost the empire in any case. India would have left peacefully or by force of arms, and England would be left with nothing, with Europe in the hands of the nazis. The age of empires was over.
Itâs an interesting one, since if Britain had sat out WW1, then France probably loses and WW2 and Hitler never occurs.
Obviously everyone would be better off if weâd stuck with Neville Chamberlain.
If Britain had sat out WW1, because it was essentially a d*ck-measuring contest between 3 grandsons of Queen Vic, would there have been a war, and thereby the Versailles Treaty, and thereby WW2.
Check your history. We should never have been in WW1. That lost 60,000 of some of our best people at the time, and the debts we ran up fighting Englandâs war hit us hard - especially in the Depression when the Poms still wanted their interest payments.
Pre-WW1 Australia had the best standard of living in the world and led the world in many fields, eg the first full length movie was made in Australia.
WW1 really set us back, and we have never got back to the position we had in those days.
Thatâs what I said âŚ
and yet legacy media keep putting them up front and centre
they should be getting the same amount of attention as a kind of annoying drunk guy at a tram stop.
Was the lettuce unavailable?
Itâs incredible to think that after a session with a professional photographer, no doubt with skills in subtle Photoshopping, that THAT was the best picture.
It looks like her neck is trying to swallow her whole head.
Itâs a white stocking stuffed with cotton wool balls and drawn on with texta. The real one came off âtoo lifelessâ. Qld Libs partying down with Liz at a garbage casino is peak conservative politics in 25
Meanwhile back in fusty old blighty, not all news is bad news.
The chaps up at Oxford have got their heads together with their chums down in Kew and come up with a jolly good idea to help our bees breed up to levels not seen since the great war.
This could be very good news for our friends all over the Commonwealth.
Indomitable spirit, to come from one of the most embarassing political downfalls ever, to trying to inspire a party whose political downfall at the last federal election sort of mirrored her own situation.
I guess now she is no longer required to visit Westminster on a regular basis, coming to Australia at least gets her out of Norfolk.
Messing with the genetics of yeast.
What could possib-ly go wrong?
Yeast?
If the beer starts to taste funny⌠Theyâre in trouble.