Im lost re this⌠so some independent doc looks at his file, all good (other than as reported knee issues etc) then he gets injured/sore after games and we discover he had a pre excisting back injury? So it was either hidden from club (not good) or he did not know and our docs found indications his back not good for a while which means the independent doc was asleep at the wheel. Not sure how it happens but bottom line we short changed either way
clubs frequently trade and draft players with prior injuries if they think they can manage and mitigate them and their potential recurrence
you are giving far too much credit for an AFL medical examination to be able to pick up on countless possible underlying physiological conditions that may or may not cause, or reggravate, injuries in players
take hairline fractures - usually diagnosed via x-rays, MRIs or CT scans - do you think that as part of a routine medical, the AFL is
a) going to pay to run MRIs on dozens and dozens of players prior to being drafted, and
b) is going to even be able to book MRI machines to do that, considering the ones they use are also shared by the entire national health system?