Surely not one who has been rewarded with one of the highest positions in the Catholic church?
Jesus was a Socialist. Nothing surer or clearer.
1 Like
and he wasn’t a Catholic !
Perhaps.
He definitely wasn’t a Protestant…
1 Like
Ahhh, … but he was, … in the purest sense of the word.
Protesteth he did, … and the Capos killed him for it, … he was raising the masses to revolt, … and they couldn’t have that.
Wow… it’s ridiculous how wrong you are. Can you point me to the socialist doctrine and the revolt He incited?
If you don’t know, … no.
Any chance Georgy boy can say he’d like to come over and help out the complainants deal with the rest of their lives like any decent priest should.
Who wouldn’t you apologise for?
If you really think that, then you have no idea why He came and what the purpose of His death was.
IT is right: Jesus was NOT a socialist. Go and read the parable of the Labourers in the Vineyard (Matthew 20:1-16), for evidence.
Kudos to whoever came up with the title of this thread! First heard Minchin’s song the first night we brought our baby girl home from the hospital 16 months ago, and will always think of that night when I hear it, or hear of it.
PS ■■■■ you, Pell. You knew. You must’ve. And for that alone you must go to jail.
1 Like
Anyone comparing a man who has been charged with rape and child abuse to the circumstances of the Saga is a farking moron at best and a deceitful, disingenuous, horrid human being at worst.
2 Likes
My political persuasion is conservative, and Leftists eat avacado on toast. Tim Minchin is a leftist, and he wrote a mean song, and probably even pays lots of money for his Avacado on toast.
Therefore Pell is innocent, because of the ‘leftist witch hunt.’
2 Likes
Last time Pell was discussed here (for knowing and covering for the kiddy fiddling of Ridsdale and others) old matey here spent a whole thread belittling and hanging ■■■■ on any who had had friends or family go through similar experiences to your friend @RedandBlackPartisan
Didn’t seem to help Pell evade those questions or accusations, but it must’ve made him feel a lot better that he went in to bat for this walking piece of ■■■■. A singularly offensive, spiteful, spineless and pointless series of attacks from a poster with a long, long history of similar ■■■■.
I don’t know exactly what it does take to get perma banned, but I would’ve thought a second round of attacking witnesses and victims of CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE is probably beyond the pale. More offensive than any number of four letter words.
But what do I know?
If only the ignore list was still a thing.
10 Likes
I reckon when the best supporting words the archbishop of Melbourne can offer is ‘he deserves a fair trial and presumption of innocence’ for CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE then maybe, just maybe, you would have the self awareness and wherewithal to consider whether or not you’re on the side of right here.
Even if, clearly, conscience is not going to be a factor at any point.
Has to be a term that has more gravity than kiddy fiddling, like kiddy violation
How about raping children?
Or buggering little boys ?
Or sticking his Dickie in kids bums ?
It’s not about ‘Right and Wrong,’ it’s about ‘Right and Left.’
Didnt you know child sexual abuse is just a political issue?
I can only infer from daytrippers comments that those on the right wing of the political spectrum are ok with raping children and covering it up.
2 Likes