Heres the Team!

Dons name pick and mix squad for NAB Challenge clash

Callum Twomey March 5, 2015 12:00 PM

ESSENDON will field an almost unrecognisable side in its NAB Challenge opener against St Kilda on Saturday, naming just two of its experienced players for the clash.

Acting captain Paul Chapman and ruckman Jonathan Giles will be the only senior players from Essendon’s main list to feature against the Saints at Morwell.

The club announced a 26-man squad on Thursday, which included last year’s first-round draft pick Kyle Langford, father-son prospect Jake Long, and Irishman Conor McKenna.

All 13 of the club’s top-up players have been named, alongside emerging youngsters Martin Gleeson, Jackson Merrett and Jason Ashby.

St Kilda have picked a stronger team for the contest, including Luke Dunstan, who missed last week’s NAB Challenge game with an ankle injury.

Ruckman Tom Hickey is in the mix to play after missing last week, as is key defender Hugh Goddard.

That 70s show: Top-up Bombers jumper numbers revealed

Callum Twomey March 5, 2015 12:01 PM

ESSENDON’S list of jumper numbers will stretch into the 70s for the NAB Challenge to cater for the club’s new recruits.

In another unusual element of an unprecedented situation, the Bombers top-up players will be wearing some unfamiliar numbers during the pre-season series.

The group of 13 fill-in players is made up of recently delisted AFL players from rival clubs as well as a handful of players listed by the club’s VFL team.

The players who had already signed on with the VFL squad were previously given jumper numbers, meaning top-ups Marcus Marigliani (No.47), James Polkinghorne (50), Aaron Heppell (51), Josh Freezer (54), Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti (55), Jordan Schroder (56) and Sam Tagliabue (58) will have lower numbers than the batch of higher-profile players.

Former Saints midfielder Clint Jones will wear No.72 having worn No.4 in his past five seasons at St Kilda.

Mitch Brown (No.73), Mitch Clisby (No.74), Jared Petrenko (No.75), James Magner (No.76) and Sam Michael (No.77) round out the new numbers.

Should any of the players in 70-plus jumpers feature in the home and away season, AFL historian Cameron Sinclair notes it would be the first time a player has worn a guernsey in the 70s.

The highest registered number ever worn is 82, by Richmond’s Ernie Taylor in one game in round 10, 1925.

In total, 10 players have worn a number 60 or higher, but the second-highest jumper number was 65, which was worn in one game by Collingwood’s Andrew Witts in round 15, 1985.

Eight players have worn the number 60 across AFL/VFL history.

ESSENDON TOP-UP PLAYER NUMBERS
47 – Marcus Marigliani
50 – James Polkinghorne
51 – Aaron Heppell
54 – Josh Freezer
55 – Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti
56 – Jordan Schroder
58 – Sam Tagliabue
72 – Clint Jones
73 – Mitch Brown
74 – Mitch Clisby
75 – Jared Petrenko
76 – James Magner
77 – Sam Michael

A bit disappointed in this team TBH, not many AFL list players in there. However, the club has probably done the right thing. Get in top up players and play them all. St Kilda might not be too happy either, I should think.

But for Chappy and Giles, that’s a VFL team

Captain Chappy in the guts.

Quoted Post

Quoted Post
So out of guys who would be available and should be in/pushing for selection the team is missing Goddard, Gwilt, Cooney, Zerrett, Daniher and Ambrose. Interesting. Would have definitely liked to see Ambrose get a gig, I wonder why he isn't?

probably don’t want them to play 3 weeks in a row and we’ll want to be closer to full strength for the last 2 than for the first 2

Will beat St Kilda

Expect some stkilda players to come out of this game very very sore.

Quoted Post

But for Chappy and Giles, that's a VFL team

Almost … Jerret? Gleeson?

Is it too early to get 72 on my duffle coat?

Quoted Post

Is it too early to get 72 on my duffle coat?

Nah do it. He’s a dead cert to be a crowd favourite.

I wonder if the club has held back on players like JD, Zerret and BJ for the inter club matches to be played with the 2012 list. You would think keeping the total of our best 22 together would be more beneficial

Quoted Post

I wonder if the club has held back on players like JD, Zerret and BJ for the inter club matches to be played with the 2012 list. You would think keeping the total of our best 22 together would be more beneficial

Hopefully that’s exactly what they are doing. Good call.

Quoted Post

I wonder if the club has held back on players like JD, Zerret and BJ for the inter club matches to be played with the 2012 list. You would think keeping the total of our best 22 together would be more beneficial

like that thinking. may also be why gwilt, and ambrosey have been held out.

Quoted Post

Quoted Post
I wonder if the club has held back on players like JD, Zerret and BJ for the inter club matches to be played with the 2012 list. You would think keeping the total of our best 22 together would be more beneficial

like that thinking. may also be why gwilt, and ambrosey have been held out.

I think they might be training ‘with’ (not against) Williamstown.

No Laverde?

Which leaves a 22 of

Fletcher Hooker Baguley
Gwilt Hurley Hibberd
Zaharakis Watson Stanton
BJ Bellchambers Heppell
Ambrose Carlisle Cooney
Chapman Daniher Zerrett

Bench from Myers Colyer Dempsey Winderlich Howlett or someone in the nab team.

Rapt to see McKenna get a game. l have booked my return flight from Da Nang to Hanoi, early on Sunday morning, so l won’t miss watching the game in the local sports bar. Heck l think l will even have a local, home made pie in salute to EFC.

Quoted Post

Which leaves a 22 of

Fletcher Hooker Baguley
Gwilt Hurley Hibberd
Zaharakis Watson Stanton
BJ Bellchambers Heppell
Ambrose Carlisle Cooney
Chapman Daniher Zerrett

Bench from Myers Colyer Dempsey Winderlich Howlett or someone in the nab team.

Except swap Carlisle and Hurley around :wink:

Who?

It’s pretty obvious that our listed players can’t play all 3 games. Who cares if Zerrett or JD are not playing in round 1 of the nab? Hawks supporters didn’t fret over Hodge and Lewis sitting out. Just because we have fewer listed players to choose from doesn’t mean we should be overtaxing them by making them play all 3 games.