IT’S TIME to eliminate the Weagles: the named team and lead-up

Hutchings in is terrible for us. Far bigger inclusion than a half baked Nic Nat

5 Likes

Decent brutal matchup lol

1 Like

About as good a squad as we could name. We are a red hot chance. Sea Level rising. Go Bombers.

3 Likes

That is a pissweak interchange

1 Like

That’s a winning team right there. We win this with all out attack.

3 Likes

Who plays as the 7th defender in the rotation? Hep? McGrath?

Snelling came from SANFL to playing AFL finals in 12 weeks.
Great story.

79 Likes

Adding to my no ■■■■■■■ way Hooker plays conspiracy, he’s not training with a number on… which makes me think his training gear wasn’t even brought over.

Addressing the defensive group now off to the side no, Ridley and Ambrose both there.

Awesome news!! Was just going off the info provided by Fog.

Petruccelle out hey.

Really need Langford and Laverde to play the games of their lives, and for Fantasia to offer at least something for Essendon to pull off a miracle win.

8 Likes

Strange players to nominate as needing big games.

I hope Hurley, Smack, Merrett and Sheil have huge games.

We can’t win without them playing at their best.

It’s often the bottom players, the last 4 or 5, that can turn the outcome of a game. They get well beaten by their opposites and it will cost the match.

2 Likes

So we don’t need our best players to play well?

You’re asking a fringe player to turn around 6? weeks of poopy form in a final.

It’s a big, big call.

Of course, but the issue isn’t about that, it is about the bottom level players playing well as well. If they do not play well then it leaves holes and no matter how well your top level players go, they can’t cover those holes up.

5 Likes

I eat big calls for breakfast.

That, and weet bix

3 Likes

2 goals v Pies

Hepp, Mcgrath, Ambrose

then maybe Ham/Snelling?

you think there might be a late change Houli?