In an organisation one person can significantly affect how the rest of the group works. Bad/wrong processes. Stifles discussion/communication. Awkward personality. Take them out and suddenly the group operates differently.
I spoke to BJ before the Geelong game and he said something similar re the chip the ball sideways gamestyle that wasn’t instructed by the coaches and how some players were waiting for the pill from 2 kicks away rather than going up closer to influence marking contests.
I felt that the team were specifically trying to not kick the ball blindly out of a pack during this game.
I was delighted to see it.
It did mean we got caught a bit more, but reckon it is much better to make the umpires take it off us, then to just kick blindly forward to their spare in defence.
it’s just a pity it took til losing to a winless carlton and a sacking of a coach for everyone from coaches and players to somehow “get it”
which really does raise the question, were they just not “gel-ing” cos they didn’t like neeld ?
Valid reasons as to not liking him, or his approach or all of that aside, the last 5 weeks of football, minus the richmond game have been polar opposite to the first 8 odd weeks.
to me it’s all started from an improvement if the defensive game.
but something changed the second neeld was sacked is stating the obvious, obviously.
but it was almost instantaneous.
being 2-6 after 8 weeks, having lost to a winless carlton, sacking an assistant coach and pretty much being in one of the biggest hole less slumps this club has ever had.
they went from rock bottom to “gel-ing” in 5 weeks, playing 4 of the top sides and getting 3 wins out of it.
something is very fishy about it all, i get they didn’t like neeld, but the longer this turn around goes, the more it doesn’t just look like just disliking him, but hating and loathing him.