Looking towards the pies - ANZAC day


#341

Licha in for ashby
howlett sub
We win by 4 goals

Curious ...., why you think in for Asby ?

Just think we needing to kick more goals. Winderlich provides that. Howlett can to as can hardingham. That's all

#342

Licha in for ashby
howlett sub
We win by 4 goals

Curious ...., why you think in for Asby ?
Just think we needing to kick more goals. Winderlich provides that. Howlett can to as can hardingham. That's all

Just to add if Ambrose is available I'd being him in also. Not sure who for though. Maybe Howlett

#343

The 2 games we have won we have had very good starts to the game. Every other game we have been really slow out of the blocks. We seem to be a very confidence based team, if we start well we normally play 4 consistent quarters. MUST start well tomorrow.

 

They simply must have their minds on the job from the first bounce. Sick of seeing us play catch up all game

Um we were 5 goals to 1 up against the Saints on Saturday night, now the difference in general play was that great, but surely a 4 goal lead at quarter time cannot be considered a slow start.


#344

PAMBROSE.


#345

 

The 2 games we have won we have had very good starts to the game. Every other game we have been really slow out of the blocks. We seem to be a very confidence based team, if we start well we normally play 4 consistent quarters. MUST start well tomorrow.

 

They simply must have their minds on the job from the first bounce. Sick of seeing us play catch up all game

Um we were 5 goals to 1 up against the Saints on Saturday night, now the difference in general play was that great, but surely a 4 goal lead at quarter time cannot be considered a slow start.

 

we didn't have a good first quarter last week. It was something like 7 shots on goal to 3 in the first qtr. We got lucky they kicked so poorly


#346

Jobe's press interview today he said Tom Bell and Goddard wouldn't play tomorrow. Also sounded skeptical about Dempsey but nothing definitive. 


#347



The 2 games we have won we have had very good starts to the game. Every other game we have been really slow out of the blocks. We seem to be a very confidence based team, if we start well we normally play 4 consistent quarters. MUST start well tomorrow.
They simply must have their minds on the job from the first bounce. Sick of seeing us play catch up all game

Um we were 5 goals to 1 up against the Saints on Saturday night, now the difference in general play was that great, but surely a 4 goal lead at quarter time cannot be considered a slow start.
we didn't have a good first quarter last week. It was something like 7 shots on goal to 3 in the first qtr. We got lucky they kicked so poorly
I think we did very well to kick 5 goals straight from 3 scoring shots in the 1st quarter then

#348

If we come out of this game with no injuries (lol) selection next week will be very interesting. …


#349

I have two tickets to this game that I need to sell. $100 to blitz members. They’ were $48 each plus surcharge. 4th tier row R ish. PM me for details


#350

Licha in for ashby
howlett sub
We win by 4 goals

Curious ...., why you think in for Asby ?
Just think we needing to kick more goals. Winderlich provides that. Howlett can to as can hardingham. That's all

Understand your reasoning BUT
Asby out??
Even with his limited game time he was in the top 5 players for us last week. Why drop someone in form?

#351

 

 

 

Licha in for ashby
howlett sub
We win by 4 goals

Curious ...., why you think in for Asby ?
Just think we needing to kick more goals. Winderlich provides that. Howlett can to as can hardingham. That's all

Even with his limited game time he was in the top 5 players for us last week. Why drop someone in form?

 

You drop Ashby/Gleeson if you bring in Dempsey, otherwise, the kids stay. They have both done really nicely.


#352


Licha in for ashby
howlett sub
We win by 4 goals

Curious ...., why you think in for Asby ?
Just think we needing to kick more goals. Winderlich provides that. Howlett can to as can hardingham. That's all
Even with his limited game time he was in the top 5 players for us last week. Why drop someone in form?
You drop Ashby/Gleeson if you bring in Dempsey, otherwise, the kids stay. They have both done really nicely.
Agree

#353

Ashby may have done a nice job in a limited time last week, but its about the quality coming in. Dempsey/licha are no brainers, and unfortunately there is going to be a hard luck case. Gleeson stays though I think, has been the pick of the kids and quite consistent


#354

Ashby may have done a nice job in a limited time last week, but its about the quality coming in. Dempsey/licha are no brainers, and unfortunately there is going to be a hard luck case. Gleeson stays though I think, has been the pick of the kids and quite consistent

As I said, I understand for Dempsey, but why do you drop someone from defense to bring in a medium forward? Why not replace a non performing/stop gap forward?


#355

Ambrose's inclusion is vital to our forward structure because it means Maxwell/Lumumba have to pick up a man instead of roaming free and taking intercept marks/disposals.
Frost and Keefe to Joe/JC. Toovey may go to Hardy and Ambrose play def fwd. Licha and Chappy to create havoc for their defence too.

I might be going out on a limb here but I don't understand why Maxwell / Lumumba would change their respective games for a 3rd gamer.


#356


Ashby may have done a nice job in a limited time last week, but its about the quality coming in. Dempsey/licha are no brainers, and unfortunately there is going to be a hard luck case. Gleeson stays though I think, has been the pick of the kids and quite consistent

As I said, I understand for Dempsey, but why do you drop someone from defense to bring in a medium forward? Why not replace a non performing/stop gap forward?

Quite often our changes arn't like for like, you can quite easily change the balance of the side - eg hardy can play both ends, watson forward, carlisle ruck etc. I think ashby has been okay, but he's probably first in line to be dropped

#357

■■■■■■' nervous already. WTF!!


#358


Ashby may have done a nice job in a limited time last week, but its about the quality coming in. Dempsey/licha are no brainers, and unfortunately there is going to be a hard luck case. Gleeson stays though I think, has been the pick of the kids and quite consistent

As I said, I understand for Dempsey, but why do you drop someone from defense to bring in a medium forward? Why not replace a non performing/stop gap forward?
Quite often our changes arn't like for like, you can quite easily change the balance of the side - eg hardy can play both ends, watson forward, carlisle ruck etc. I think ashby has been okay, but he's probably first in line to be dropped

Why is Ashby first in line?
Thought it was a player under performing who would be first in line.
And the list is long before you get to Asby

#359

 

 

Ashby may have done a nice job in a limited time last week, but its about the quality coming in. Dempsey/licha are no brainers, and unfortunately there is going to be a hard luck case. Gleeson stays though I think, has been the pick of the kids and quite consistent

As I said, I understand for Dempsey, but why do you drop someone from defense to bring in a medium forward? Why not replace a non performing/stop gap forward?

Quite often our changes arn't like for like, you can quite easily change the balance of the side - eg hardy can play both ends, watson forward, carlisle ruck etc. I think ashby has been okay, but he's probably first in line to be dropped

 

Each to their own I guess. A kid that comes in a runs at 85% disposal efficiency since game one, would not be the first person I'd drop. I'm a Hardy fan, but I wouldn't drop Ashby to move him back.


#360


Ashby may have done a nice job in a limited time last week, but its about the quality coming in. Dempsey/licha are no brainers, and unfortunately there is going to be a hard luck case. Gleeson stays though I think, has been the pick of the kids and quite consistent

As I said, I understand for Dempsey, but why do you drop someone from defense to bring in a medium forward? Why not replace a non performing/stop gap forward?
Quite often our changes arn't like for like, you can quite easily change the balance of the side - eg hardy can play both ends, watson forward, carlisle ruck etc. I think ashby has been okay, but he's probably first in line to be dropped
Why is Ashby first in line?
Thought it was a player under performing who would be first in line.
And the list is long before you get to Asby

we'll see