I really had no intentionā¦ i was waiting for last weeks team in an outs on the AFL page and hereā¦ ā¦ and it popped up at the top of the main pageā¦ so i had a browse and it just so happened that what was being discussed was not Gay marriage but gay conversionā¦ and i didnāt think anyone seriously considered the implication of making such a thing illegal and that banning it is inconsistent with the same grounds LGBT is built uponā¦ ā¦ be who you want to be or think you are, and not forced to be something you dont want to be etcā¦ so i mentioned itā¦
I dont think i have even been in the thread since i signed back upā¦ early last yearā¦
āUsuallyā maybeā¦
but thatās not what is being discussed, I said from the get go, i do not support coercive or Forced Therapiesā¦ well at least for non-criminals. Because we (most of the population) do condone it in jails for sex offender rehabilitation.
But if a professional wanted to advertise such a thing that was not forced or coercive then i cant see why there is a problem with it given we tend to socially accept therapy to stop people who want to stop a behaviour they donāt want or like in themselves.
While i dont think it would be a popular service, i cant see anything actually wrong providing it if there a skilled therapist etcā¦
Id agree, that the name is a bit muchā¦ but if it were named:
āmanaging your sexual desire therapyā
i cant see how that would not be the same thing just by another nameā¦ and by banning the former you incidentally muddy the water of someone seeking the later especially for the therapist legally and what they can provide say and do.
So why wouldnāt someone struggling with there homosexuality and wanting to become Hetrosexual be any diffrent? why shouldnāt they have a long process of counselling and medication to deal with there struggle to identify? and why not make it have strict guidelines much the same?
Dont confuse me knowing the subject better than you as being someone who does gay conversion, as far as im concerned you are redneck for not being able to open your eyes to others sexual struggles you never considered, but in your dogma you instantly reject it. I pity you.
Itās some time since it was a crime to commit homosexual acts and SSM has redressed inequalities in status, but there are still pockets of homophobia in society.
I think one of the key points as to the difference between gender transition and GCT is the outcome, transition in most cases helps reduce mental health issues in its patients. Whereas GCT usually has the opposite affect.
And also transitioning is managed by actual medical professionals.
A gay person in a minority/ religion adhering community would be under enormous pressure to conform to heterosexual behaviour, at risk of being ostracised by the community. In such circumstances freedom of choice to engage in quackery conversion therapy would be highly circumscribed by community and family pressure.
They suggested that 75% of Catholcs voted Yes
And in Melbourne, strongly disagreed with Archbishop Hartās stance on sacking gays from Catholic schools.
Letās get one thing straight (Ha, Ha) Electric Shock Treatment was used extensively when the belief was all paedophiles were also homosexual which was a totally false theory. When in actual fact, most sex offenders who are into underage children are usually men in heterosexual relationships. Men who are married and have children of their own or are living with a women and their partner has children.
Having worked with sex offenders there is no one size fits all in therapy and certainly I would say rehabilitation is all but useless because all the men I worked with were simply unable to see anything wrong with their behaviour. They had no remorse and the moment they were released they were right back where they began, outside schools and in places where there had access easy to both male and female children.