From the article
'Liberal senators James Paterson and David Fawcett will not continue the argument that those service providers should be able to say no to a same-sex wedding if they are opposed to gay marriage.
But the two senators have flagged they will introduce five other amendments, including having two definitions for marriage.
They want to keep the definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman as well as having a separate definition that covers same-sex couples that says “marriage is the union of two people to the exclusion of all others”.
The two senators argue that having both definitions clarifies that both views are legitimately held."
Far out, isn’t that what it was prior to John Howard changing it. We had to go through this whole stupid exercise when really they could/should have put it back to the original wording.