I’ve often thought about this in the past but do we think there’s a correlation between premiership winning teams and the amount of dads on the list?
We haven’t had a consistent bunch of dads on the list since the Lloyd/Hird days. Even when Watson, Stanton etc were the senior players they weren’t dad’s.
I do think having dad’s on the list certainly brings a sense of maturity to the list.
Maturity matters, but maturity is only indirectly related to having children. There are plenty of immature fathers, and plenty of mature players who are not fathers.
I recall in 2018 that West Coast claimed the family connection with so many parents helped bind the team. Adam Simpson easier it and said the connectivity was great as there were less guys drinking ■■■■ til early in the morning.