Nathan Brown

[barnz]

gonna hit up my boy jackson taylor if he gets anything under 4 weeks.

[Henry_s_Angry_Pills]

Umpire Mollison says he couldn’t tell if contact was high orhow far Saad was from the ball and that Saad was still in a position to influence play.

Certainly blows any conspiracy theories about umps conspiring out of the water, this pumpkin sounds like he has absolutely zero idea.
Are they absolutey sure he was actually at the game?

[aboods]

Guilty of intentional conduct

[Robin_Close]

So he doesn’t know how far saad was from the ball but he does know for sure that saad was in a position to influence play. That’s clearly a blatant farking lie!

[aboods]

So he doesn’t know how far saad was from the ball but he does know for sure that saad was in a position to influence play. That’s clearly a blatant farking lie!

I think you’re overrating the intelligence of these guys

[efc1robbo]

Interesting proceedings so far. Umpire Mollison says he couldn’t tell if contact was high orhow far Saad was from the ball and that Saad was still in a position to influence play. I call bs on that one. The ball was well and truly out of Saad’s sphere when he was hit. so far sounding good for Brown.

if he wasn’t sure, then why did he pay a free kick against Brown? what a douche

[Stressed_out]

Gleeson only fighting for the minimum 3 - I thought he might go for 4 matches. either way Brown’s gone for the year, I can live with that.

[wimmera1]

Also happy with 3.
Not what I’d give it, but okay.

[theDJR]

Interesting proceedings so far. Umpire Mollison says he couldn’t tell if contact was high orhow far Saad was from the ball and that Saad was still in a position to influence play.

Ah, that’s why he paid the automatic fifty metre penalty free, thereby guaranteeing us the goal.

Get your story straight, AwFuL.

[Stressed_out]

Funny that AFL’s own website says it’s a minimum 3 weeks but the tribunal chairman isn’t sure if “that’s a rule or guideline”. Basket case.

[aboods]

Funny that AFL’s own website says it’s a minimum 3 weeks but the tribunal chairman isn’t sure if “that’s a rule or guideline”. Basket case.

Surely he should know the AFL doesn’t have any rules.

[loyalandproud]

Good- had to be at least 3

[alex.f.94]

3 is a suitable punishment. 4 would have been OTT

[sj_2150]

Happy with that

[Mendozaaaa]

I understand what he was trying to do but he definitely went a tad over the top. He’ll probably get two.

3 will do.

[Windy_Dill]

Three seems about right.

[The_Ant]

too soon.

[Finding_Nino]

Yep 3 seems about right

[Humble_NSW_Fan]

It was a 4 week hit for sure.

If it was an EFC player, would have been 6.

[Deckham]

Is it over and what did he get???