Sounds remarkably similar, i.e. identical, to my suggestion, only at that time I didn’t know who picks 6, 7 and 8 were.
So it’s either “great minds think alike” or “fools never differ”.
Sounds remarkably similar, i.e. identical, to my suggestion, only at that time I didn’t know who picks 6, 7 and 8 were.
So it’s either “great minds think alike” or “fools never differ”.
#2 - Draper
#6 - Caldwell
#13 - Josh Eyre
#16 - Zach Reid
#19 - Nick Cox
#20 - 2 Metre Petre
#31 -Cody Brand
#32 Archie Perkins (Edit)
#57 Nick Hind
So Archie Perkins doesn’t get a number?
No. He gets “X”.
Is “Factor Boy”.
He can have 32
You’re just making it up as you go along, aren’t you?
Appears Cox 13, Perkins 16, Brand 38, Reid 31, Eyre 32
There’s a vid released on the EFC socials. Looks like:
Cox - #13
Perkins - #16
Eyre - #31
Brand - #38 (name was on locker)
Reid - Not 100% sure but looks like he got a number in the 30s. Maybe #32?
If you pause it when its showing locker 31,32 you can see the names on the upper right corner
Reid 31, Eyre 32
Yeah I posted it up there ^^ haha
So it leaves #2 Draper, #6 Caldwell #19 Hind and #20 Wright, my guess
anyone know what the Jobe Watson award shown on the wall relates too?
Cox - #13
Perkins - #16
Reid - #31
Eyre - #32
Brand - #38
Confirmed.
So they are continuing with the worstfold ‘allocate numbers in draft order’ shyte.
I like to pretend that #16 has been retired since Barnard for those 4 grand final goals.
As if you wouldn’t give Brand 31 as he has worked with Fletch so closely.
Maybe he didn’t want the comparison with Fletch, and with it the expectation of fans?
Utter lack of imagination, but in the end they are only numbers.