Not sure on the Langford mill, actually I am. Bit disappointed, however Jobe called it with Zerret happy to be wrong with Langers.
Was still hoping on Smith #4 and #5 Stringer/McKenna and McGrath to keep #1 is awesome. Stringer doesn’t have to wait long to get #9.
Wow. A bit of punctuation, my man!
That said - I agree that ‘9’ suits Stringer. As far as numbers ‘suit’ anyone, that is.
Trent Mynott #5
But who gets no.4 after Langers asks for a trade at the end of 2018 to look for better opportunities?
Rory sloane.
Not in the age demographic
Ok I’ll have a crack…
#4 Langford
#5 Laverde
#24 Smith
#25 Stringer
#30 Houlahan
#33 Saad
#35 Guelfi
#39 Zerk-Thatcher
#40 Mynott
Potentially though Lav might stay 33 and Saad 42 and we leave 5 vacant 1 year.
Think it’ll go in the order the new boys joined the club. Assuming the mail’s right about Langford I think it’ll be
4 Langford
5 Smith
24 Saad
25 Stringer
30 Houlahan
35 Zerk-Thatcher
39 Guelfi
40 Mynott
Member Forum agenda
7:37PM
New recruits - Jumper Number Reveal and Q&A on stage – Adrian Dodoro
Yay! All to be revealed tonight
REVS
Can you imagine the smile on Langford’s face?
7:39PM
First person complains about new recipient of #4, regardless of who it is.
7:40PM
First person complains about new recipient of #5, regardless of who it is. Then, several more.
Later:
Alan Noonan posts about how jumper #5 used to not be a big deal. 
If Langford gets 4 I’ll vomit.
Give it to houlahan
Get a sick bag champ
4: Langford
5: Smith
24: Houlahan
25: Stringer
30: Zerk
35: Guelfi
39: Aynott
40: Lavendar
42: Saad
Told ya
I’m gonna go full Karmabomber about this
