Lucky horse
1 Like
Most industries, if your CV is one page with âgood football personâ you wonât get far.
2 Likes
No. No member of the AFL executive of 2013-2016 should be entitled to a cent of Essendon membership money.
It has nothing to do with morals.
It has everything to do with ethics.
12 Likes
âBest mates with the big bossâ quite often does thoughâŚ
1 Like
Luke Ball in the running for the vacant HOF position.
1 Like
I reckon heâd be excellent.
1 Like
how on earth?
I know. If youâve heard him on radio for 4 minutes, it is evident heâs not up to any sort of position.
1 Like
Yep. So let them loose on the real world and into the gutter
What about as a football administrator?
Interesting comment given your viewâs on Wellman.
Personally I think both would be great additions for the club. Lethlan left the AFL due to his âoff fieldâ exploits. He was a rising star/gun at the AFL so if we could get him in to perform a role why wouldnât we? Because heâs mate with Gill? Doesnât make sense to me.
I was talking about Luke Ball⌠at least I thought I was. Definitely a no to the other guy.
4 Likes
Might have got my wires crossed!
Itâs been that kinda day 
2 Likes
Am I the only one not fussed with hiring him if heâs highly rated and good at his job?
4 Likes
This great post needs to be read again.
Plus we do not need the fish rejected by both our most despised adversaries - the AFL executive and FCFC.
6 Likes
You nailed it - Of course, Lethlean is free to apply but I doubt his suitability - This is someone whoâs been applying for CEO positions which is a world of difference from Footy Operationâs Manager - Some would even argue to apply for this position is a backwards movement.
Also applied for the Blooos and got knocked back. It he isnât good enough for them, l doubt that he will be good enough for us. Applying for the Pies possie, he sounds a better fit for them.
1 Like
Yeah, seems light on experience for mine.
Different positions. Their openings were CEO roles while our job is the Head of Footy Ops.