Not suprisingly, the blacked out link was to a white nationalist website.
Meanwhile, the hateful gaystapo left are posting these.
Just kidding, this one is also by another right wing ‘Australian Nationalists’. ie: Nazi’s.
Darebin joins Yarra in not celebrating Australia Day citizenship ceremonies
2 Likes
I read a tweet the other day:
Right wing uprisings give you nazis
Left wing give you weekends
4 Likes
That’s one sobering link. Drop the Russian “Tsar Bomba” 100 Mt on Melbourne and think “fark”.
There’s a great doco on the Tsar Bomba on youtube.
It actually broke windows in western europe.
Ta, I’ll look it up.
And an 8 hour day, … and Medicare, … and NDIS, … and…a decent minimum wage, . and safer workplaces, and …
The greens?
Tried that. Does some real scary things to Tokyo and New York too. Apparently, even though it was the largest bomb ever detonated it theoretically could have been twice as big if they included one extra component. Good thing they didn’t bother 
And just for the lulz, one can drop multiples… 
IIRC one reason was that the Tsar was rushed to completion. That and it was huge. The pilots of the plane that dropped it were told that they may not survive the blast with 50mt. Also fallout etc was another reason.
1 Like
Another MP implicated in the citizenship thing. This one seems even more vague. This ■■■■ is going to get more stupid and the high court can’t move their arses quick enough to resolve it.
That’s insane. Lot easier to strap it to a ■■■■■■ huge rocket. Something twice that size is nuts and that was the 60s. 50 years ago. What could have been conceived of if not made since then?
There is basically no theoretical limit to the yield of a hydrogen bomb. It’s all about how much tritium you pump into the fusion reaction. There’s just not a hell of a lot of point going THAT big. There’s only so dead you can kill someone. They could have doubled, or tripled the Tsar Bomba yield if they’d wanted to - or increased it by a factor of 100. But once it gets that big - how do you deliver it? And presumably there’s SOMETHING about the continent you’re dropping it on that you want to stay intact. The continental plate, for instance. Or the atmosphere above it.
A lot of smaller ones can cause just as much ruin with less side-effects per megaton.
Thinking about this stuff for a living must be the most depressing job in the world.
2 Likes
You deliver it using a technique call “toss bombing” where the plane flies past its target, then it does a vertical loop, and during the upward part of the loop the bomb is released, and its natural trajectory means the bomb is flung back to the target, meanwhile the plane continues its loop and makes its getaway. the plane is well gone by the time the bomb explodes.
If you mean Sudmalis, it seems that there are teams of scoop reporters chasing down documents. The one cited, an incoming passenger document for a child, shows nothing, although it was headlined as showing she was British. It also showed that she was an Australian citizen returning home . At that time all Australian citizens were British subjects.
She was born in Australia to an English mother who later naturalised. She claims to have checked with the Brits and was told she does not have British citizenship.
1 Like
Nah, you deliver it via ICBM, triggered by pressing a button in a bunker a thousand miles away.
Gave us Hanson & Roberts into the Senate?
And another 2-3 years of Boneless & co?
500 MTs…that would be x10 more powerful than the Tsar Bomba (largest nuke ever detonated) @ 50 MT
You don’t seem to understand what democracy is, its job is to curtail the rights of others in favour of the masses, so the autonomy of the many is reflected in the laws… see: John Locke.
Now, there are certain limitations on that depending on the democratic model… in america it swings both ways… they have lots of Guns, and SSM.
Here… we have less guns wielded, but no SSM. Probably because the interpretation of what constitutes what a autonomous human can be allowed to do differs based on their philosophical arguments.
What do you prefer more liberal Gun laws with SSM or Stricter Gun laws with no SSM?